Re: is there any use to keep translating gnome 2.10?

2005-06-11 Thread Carlos Perelló Marín
On Sat, 2005-06-11 at 14:52 +0200, Danilo ¦egan wrote: > Today at 12:13, Carlos Perelló Marín wrote: > > >> What are you going to do with string freeze breakages? I.e. if you > >> ship a tarball which has "_Borwse", and it's later fixed in CVS and > >> translations are updated, this is going to e

Re: is there any use to keep translating gnome 2.10?

2005-06-11 Thread Danilo Šegan
Today at 12:13, Carlos Perelló Marín wrote: >> What are you going to do with string freeze breakages? I.e. if you >> ship a tarball which has "_Borwse", and it's later fixed in CVS and >> translations are updated, this is going to end up untranslated, right? > > Not really, as our .pot files wil

Re: is there any use to keep translating gnome 2.10?

2005-06-11 Thread Carlos Perelló Marín
On Sat, 2005-06-11 at 10:39 +0200, Danilo ¦egan wrote: > Hi Carlos, Hi > > Yesterday at 20:46, Carlos Perelló Marín wrote: > > > I can tell you that we are developing a script in Ubuntu to get > > translations from GNOME's CVS into our system so we will get all updates > > after release as we p

Re: is there any use to keep translating gnome 2.10?

2005-06-11 Thread Vincent Untz
(cc'ing release team) Le samedi 11 juin 2005 à 10:39 +0200, Danilo Šegan a écrit : > > So for instance, my recommendation is that, after 2.10.3 is released, > > you should concentrate on 2.11 and take care of the 2.10 branches only > > after you have 2.11 in a good status. > > Current roadmap[1]

Re: is there any use to keep translating gnome 2.10?

2005-06-11 Thread Danilo Šegan
Hi Carlos, Yesterday at 20:46, Carlos Perelló Marín wrote: > I can tell you that we are developing a script in Ubuntu to get > translations from GNOME's CVS into our system so we will get all updates > after release as we provide translation updates after release. That > means that any translatio