I have just committed a fix for
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=300224
to GTK+ head. This adds a number of new translatable strings for
key names to GTK+. They all use Q_() and have an easily recognizable
context string:
keyboard label|Delete
keyboard label|Insert
I have not marked al
Translation status changes from 2005-06-02 to 2005-06-09.
Total message count is stable at 32634.
Average change during this period was 0.255%.
Top 5 movers of the week:
* Slovenian (up 11.81%, now partially supported)
* Galician (up 9.99%, unsupported)
* Estonian (up 0.42%, partially supp
Translation status changes from 2005-06-02 to 2005-06-09.
Total message count has changed from 33034 to 32967.
Average change during this period was 0.036%.
Top 5 movers of the week:
* Galician (up 9.78%, now unsupported)
* Slovenian (up 1.55%, unsupported)
* Danish (up 0.94%, supported)
tor 2005-06-09 klockan 11:32 -0400 skrev Rodney Dawes:
> I just branched gnome-icon-theme for gnome 2.10. The branchpoint is
> based off the last 2.10 release.
Thanks for the notice. The GNOME 2.10 translation status pages should
show the new stable gnome-icon-theme branch as soon as they update.
Hello,
I just checked fifth toe group of HEAD release in Persian locale, and it
shows that there are no messages in gthumb.pot while there are actually
863 untranslated messages there. Why is that? Here is the URL:
http://l10n-status.gnome.org/HEAD/fa/fifth-toe/index.html
--
Meelad Zakaria <[EMAI
Le jeudi 09 juin 2005 à 10:52 -0700, Adam Weinberger a écrit :
> You know, it'd be really nice for app maintainers to let us know when
> they're not going to release any new versions from a branch. There are
> many apps and libs that are released once per GNOME release, and never
> again. Yet pe
Danilo Šegan wrote:
Hi Yair,
As long as there are chances that maintainers will roll out tarballs
of their apps along with updated translations from gnome-2-10
branches, YES!
And those chances are pretty good, no matter if there's not any other
2.10.* release scheduled on [1], and it's so for a
Hi Yair,
As long as there are chances that maintainers will roll out tarballs
of their apps along with updated translations from gnome-2-10
branches, YES!
And those chances are pretty good, no matter if there's not any other
2.10.* release scheduled on [1], and it's so for at least another
month
Yair> is there any use to keep translating gnome 2.10?
It will be shipped in Mandriva Linux 2006, which is scheduled at Oct 2005.
___
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
yair
___
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
I just branched gnome-icon-theme for gnome 2.10. The branchpoint is
based off the last 2.10 release.
-- dobey
___
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
On Thu, 09 Jun 2005 16:30:31 +0800, Funda Wang wrote:
> The real problem is that, the developers are creating words which are not
> commonly used, such as spatial mode of Nautilus. Why it is called spatial
> mode, rather than "creating seperated window for every folder"?
IMHO, "spatial mode" is
Keld Jørn Simonsen wrote:
On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 04:30:31PM +0800, Funda Wang wrote:
Clytie> WAN cards: Wide Area Network cards, Funda, AFAIK.
Thanks. I was thing of it at first. But what is that? Are the LAN cards
really different from the WAN cards? I've never heard of such a device
named
On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 04:30:31PM +0800, Funda Wang wrote:
> Clytie> WAN cards: Wide Area Network cards, Funda, AFAIK.
> Thanks. I was thing of it at first. But what is that? Are the LAN cards
> really different from the WAN cards? I've never heard of such a device
> named as "WAN cards", besides
On 09/06/2005, at 6:00 PM, Funda Wang wrote:
Thanks. I was thing of it at first. But what is that? Are the LAN
cards
really different from the WAN cards? I've never heard of such a device
named as "WAN cards", besides ADSL modem, Cable modem, ATM adaptor,
etc.
Some adaptors or modems get
Clytie> WAN cards: Wide Area Network cards, Funda, AFAIK.
Thanks. I was thing of it at first. But what is that? Are the LAN cards
really different from the WAN cards? I've never heard of such a device
named as "WAN cards", besides ADSL modem, Cable modem, ATM adaptor, etc.
The real problem is that
16 matches
Mail list logo
