On Wed, 2005-06-08 at 00:40 +0200, Christian Rose wrote:
> I'm afraid the current branch name will be very confusing to many
> contributors, not at least translators, who work with many modules at
> the same time and rely on branches being named consistently.
>
Understood.
> The policy (http://d
tis 2005-06-07 klockan 16:06 -0600 skrev Gary Ekker:
> On Tue, 2005-06-07 at 23:33 +0200, Christian Rose wrote:
> > mån 2005-06-06 klockan 20:44 -0600 skrev Gary Ekker:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > The stable branch is now gnome-2-8¸ development branch is HEAD with a
> > > version bump to 2.11.0.
> >
On Tue, 2005-06-07 at 23:33 +0200, Christian Rose wrote:
> mån 2005-06-06 klockan 20:44 -0600 skrev Gary Ekker:
> > Hi,
> >
> > The stable branch is now gnome-2-8¸ development branch is HEAD with a
> > version bump to 2.11.0.
>
> I'm confused -- is this stable branch intended as being the sta
man, 06 06 2005 kl. 12:01 +0200, skrev Benoît Dejean:
> The stable branch is gnome-2-10 and the development branch is HEAD.
Thanks for notifying us, the branch should be reflected in our
translation statistics soon.
Best regards
--
Martin Willemoes Hansen
___
Hi,
The stable branch is now gnome-2-8¸ development branch is HEAD with a
version bump to 2.11.0.
Cheers.
-Gary
___
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
man, 06,.06.2005 kl. 09.25 +0200, skrev Lucas Vieites:
> El lun, 06-06-2005 a las 08:14 +0300, Alexander Shopov escribió:
> > > Danilo Šegan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Christian Rose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >
> > I welcome our new translation overlords.
>
> All our base are belong to you ;-)