I stand corrected. :)
On 3/3/09, Andrew Conkling wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 10:31, Brian Lucas wrote:
>
>> gnome-desktop is actually just a meta package and does no harm to remove.
>
>
> True, but ubuntu-desktop is a different package. (If I recall, Ubuntu
> doesn't even install gnome-desk
Correct
2009/3/3 Brian Lucas
>
> I stand corrected. :)
>
> On 3/3/09, Andrew Conkling wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 10:31, Brian Lucas wrote:
> >
> >> gnome-desktop is actually just a meta package and does no harm to
> remove.
> >
> >
> > True, but ubuntu-desktop is a different package. (I
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 10:31, Brian Lucas wrote:
> gnome-desktop is actually just a meta package and does no harm to remove.
True, but ubuntu-desktop is a different package. (If I recall, Ubuntu
doesn't even install gnome-desktop.) The reason ubuntu-desktop is important
is that it manages all t
gnome-desktop is actually just a meta package and does no harm to remove.
On 3/3/09, Andrew Conkling wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 07:09, Martyn wrote:
>
>> Is there a way to remove Evolution without losing the gnome-do-plugins
>> please.
>>
>> I installed juanty this morning and one of the
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 07:09, Martyn wrote:
> Is there a way to remove Evolution without losing the gnome-do-plugins
> please.
>
> I installed juanty this morning and one of the first things i do is
> remove Evolution but when installing Do it reinstalls it... I want the
> plugins but not the ma
