On 22 February 2010 05:27, Jason White wrote:
> I actually think Gnome accessibility efforts are remarkably successful, given
> the limited resources available and the nature of the problems that need to be
> solved.
+1000
> If user
> interfaces, including the free software/open-source community
Steve Lee wrote:
> On 22 February 2010 05:27, Jason White wrote:
> > If user interfaces, including the free software/open-source community, are
> > headed toward an era in which a descendant of what we today call a "Web
> > browser" becomes the desktop, then what would make most sense is a
> >
Nolan Darilek, le Sun 21 Feb 2010 22:58:43 -0600, a écrit :
> I'm curious to know what issues you're
> having with GNOME that make it so vastly difficult in your situation,
Maybe not "vastly", but in the case of gnome-terminal not working, that
drops the whole lot of console applications, which
Jason White, le Mon 22 Feb 2010 16:27:53 +1100, a écrit :
> The decision process doesn't have the same top-down control structure
> that a proprietary operating system vendor can exercise.
Mmm, Even free software projects do have such top-down control
structures. For instance in Debian you're not
Le lundi 22 février 2010, à 11:53 +0100, Samuel Thibault a écrit :
> - in glade, some automatic tests could be done: for instance, if a
> button doesn't have _any_ text attached to it, glade could warn the
> developper.
Is there a bug opened for this? :-)
Vincent
--
Les gens heureux ne sont
Dear reader,
Mousetweaks version 2.29.91 has been released and can be downloaded from:
http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/mousetweaks/2.29/
sha256sum of mousetweaks-2.29.91.tar.bz2:
f97a6a89448f7fccc167e48edd5abd5597229063125610d21cbfe6406d49418f
sha256sum of mousetweaks-2.29.91.tar.gz
91
I am now moving to Gnome from KDE. In KDE I have configured
single-click mode, in this mode there is no concept of a double click.
I see that Nautilus can be configured for single click, but what about
other apps? For instance Evolution still needs a double click to open
contacts.
Note that I sent
Hi.
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 11:53:24AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Mmm, Even free software projects do have such top-down control
> structures. For instance in Debian you're not supposed to leave an
> architecture apart when you package an application, and critical bugs on
> them are release-c
On Mon, 2010-02-22 at 14:49 -0600, Kenny Hitt wrote:
> Hi.
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 11:53:24AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Mmm, Even free software projects do have such top-down control
> > structures. For instance in Debian you're not supposed to leave an
> > architecture apart when you pa
Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Jason White, le Mon 22 Feb 2010 16:27:53 +1100, a écrit :
> > The decision process doesn't have the same top-down control structure
> > that a proprietary operating system vendor can exercise.
>
> Mmm, Even free software projects do have such top-down control
> structures
10 matches
Mail list logo
