2009/11/5 Willie Walker :
> I think there's a few sides to this.
And another is to expose CS students to the concepts so they take them
forwards with them into industry experience.
Steve
___
gnome-accessibility-list mailing list
gnome-accessibility-list
From: Francesco Fumanti
> These two paragraphs make me wonder the following:
>
> - Is there any contact between the GNOME A11y Team and the GNOME Shell
> developers?
>
> - Do the GNOME Shell developers know what properties have to be present
> in the GNOME Shell to make it support a11y? As ap
Hi Francesco:
- Is there any contact between the GNOME A11y Team and the GNOME Shell
developers?
Yes.
- Do the GNOME Shell developers know what properties have to be present
in the GNOME Shell to make it support a11y? As apparently, the GNOME
Shell is still a moving target, the sooner the G
Hi,
Willie Walker wrote:
The final kicker for GNOME Shell is that it is an actively churning
moving target. The ancient model that the a11y cleanup team will come
in afterwards and resolve a11y issues cannot possibly work in this case.
As with every project, I truly believe that accessible d
Hi All:
In a nutshell -- IMO, GNOME 2.30 might be good enough to call a "Preview
for GNOME 3.0", but nowhere near something we should call GNOME 3.0. We
want GNOME 3.0 to be solid and sexy for everyone. GNOME 2.32 is
probably the earliest we should shoot for. I might also suggest we
create
Hi Vincent,
I can't speak for other accessibility projects but I can give you a
summary from the On-screen Keyboard point of view. The On-screen
Keyboard effort currently consists of two projects: GOK [1] and Caribou [2].
For GOK, we are working on removing dependencies on deprecated libraries
fo
Hi,
The release team is gathering comments from various teams to get a
proper idea of which of March or September 2010 is more appropriate for
the release of GNOME 3.0. The decision for the release date is following
what we set in the 3.0 planning document [1]: we want 3.0 to be out in
2010, but w
