On Tue, 2010-09-07 at 20:46 -0500, Bryen M. Yunashko wrote:
> We actually do have an ICS file that I posted on my server a while
> back (and will probably need to be updated soon.) However, I'd like
> to get this hosted directly on GNOME's servers in a way that we all
> can update rather than just
From: Eitan Isaacson
>> 1. Timetable? We concluded that it wouldn't require to debate that,
>>as we have already discussed and tried several different
>>timetables. But just to confirm that.
>>
>
> I get very confused as to when meetings are, and it seems like the
> times accommodate Eu
From: Stormy Peters
> On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 6:31 PM, Heidi Ellis wrote:
>>
>>
>> 3. I do not yet have a clear enough idea as to what are acceptable agenda
>> items to comment on the need for operating using an agenda or not. Perhaps
>> some insight into the parameters for what is acceptable/use
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 7:46 PM, Bryen M. Yunashko wrote:
>
> The other thing I would like to do, which is once again a question for
> GNOME infrastructure, like above with the ICS file hosting, is to host a
> meetbot on GNOME's IRC network. I can tell you that since I started using
> a meetbot i
On Tue, 2010-09-07 at 12:13 -0700, Eitan Isaacson wrote:
> Thanks API and all for doing these meetings. Sorry I rarely get to
> attend meetings, so my opinions should not be taken too seriously.
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 7:24 AM, Piñeiro wrote:
>
>
> During the last meeting
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 6:31 PM, Heidi Ellis wrote:
>
>
> 3. I do not yet have a clear enough idea as to what are acceptable agenda
> items to comment on the need for operating using an agenda or not. Perhaps
> some insight into the parameters for what is acceptable/useful agenda items
> would help
ty-list-boun...@gnome.org] On Behalf Of Piñeiro
Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2010 10:24 AM
To: gnome-accessibility-list@gnome.org
Subject: About the current a11y meeting and format
During the last meeting [1], we were discussing about the current
status of the weekly meetings, and we conclude that
Thanks API and all for doing these meetings. Sorry I rarely get to attend
meetings, so my opinions should not be taken too seriously.
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 7:24 AM, Piñeiro wrote:
>
> During the last meeting [1], we were discussing about the current
> status of the weekly meetings, and we concl
During the last meeting [1], we were discussing about the current
status of the weekly meetings, and we conclude that we need the input
of more people. So:
1. Timetable? We concluded that it wouldn't require to debate that,
as we have already discussed and tried several different
timetab
