Re: Tentative CSUN hackfest schedule?

2010-02-02 Thread Steve Lee
On 2 February 2010 15:29, Eitan Isaacson wrote: > Sorry I have not been responding to e-mail, i am traveling a bit now. In > Cambridge UK. Welcome to the UK. Even if it is with Oxford's traditional enemy :-) The Project:Possibility students who win the SS12 event are now officially part of the

Re: GNOME 2.30: go stable or go cutting edge?

2010-02-02 Thread Tom Masterson
Speaking from the standpoint of a user. I want it to be stable. I don't mind working with an unstable version on a virtual machine but I want my main machine to remain stable so I can work and I want to be able to upgrade my OS (ubuntu) without loosing my accessibility. Granted I do most of

Re: Tentative CSUN hackfest schedule?

2010-02-02 Thread Eitan Isaacson
Ok, this is good news, it's coming together! Sorry I have not been responding to e-mail, i am traveling a bit now. In Cambridge UK. We were originally concerned about the length of the conference, especially when it comes to accommodation costs for the foundation. So I made a decision earlier on

Re: Tentative CSUN hackfest schedule?

2010-02-02 Thread Bryen M. Yunashko
On Tue, 2010-02-02 at 14:31 +, Steve Lee wrote: > On 1 February 2010 16:28, Joanmarie Diggs wrote: > > Thanks Eitan. > > > > Given that I'm looking at 9 to 14 hours travel time depending on > > layovers and the like, > > Wow that is almost as long as my journey from UK. LA was much easier. >

Re: Tentative CSUN hackfest schedule?

2010-02-02 Thread Steve Lee
On 1 February 2010 19:29, Peter Korn wrote: > While conference events start on March 21st with evening pre-conference > registration, the exhibit floor is open Wednesday the 24th through Saturday Thanks Peter - I'd missed the floor didn't open till later. >  I suggest we either have hackfest act

Re: Tentative CSUN hackfest schedule?

2010-02-02 Thread Steve Lee
On 1 February 2010 16:28, Joanmarie Diggs wrote: > Thanks Eitan. > > Given that I'm looking at 9 to 14 hours travel time depending on > layovers and the like, Wow that is almost as long as my journey from UK. LA was much easier. I'm now planning to arrive to arrive on 22nd and leaving the last da

Re: GNOME 2.30: go stable or go cutting edge?

2010-02-02 Thread Stephen Shaw
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 03:12, Halim Sahin wrote: > Hi Will, > > I think both versions of at-spi should be included in gnome-2.30, > because at-spi2 need a lot of testing and not all users  want to build > it from source. > openSUSE had at-spi2 in 11.2, however a really old version and wasn't very

Introduction to open accessibility

2010-02-02 Thread Steve Lee
I just thought I'd mention that OSS Watch have now published an introductory article on open accessibility. Needless to say GNOME get a mention ;-) http://www.oss-watch.ac.uk/resources/openaccessibility.xml -- Steve Lee ___ gnome-accessibility-list mai

Re: GNOME 2.30: go stable or go cutting edge?

2010-02-02 Thread Jason White
Halim Sahin wrote: > > I think both versions of at-spi should be included in gnome-2.30, > because at-spi2 need a lot of testing and not all users want to build > it from source. Or if this isn't feasible, we should at least encourage operating system distributions to create test packages. Deb

Re: GNOME 2.30: go stable or go cutting edge?

2010-02-02 Thread Halim Sahin
Hi Will, I think both versions of at-spi should be included in gnome-2.30, because at-spi2 need a lot of testing and not all users want to build it from source. BTW.: Do we have a big improovement of a11y in gnome 2.30 compared to gnome 2.28? If not, we should make at-spi2 as default for gnome