Steve Lee wrote:
Thanks Brian, I see a lot of the CC BY-SA and it seems the closest to
Open Source copyleft for non-software. BY looks closest to a liberal,
BSD style licence. PD means you effectively waive all copyright and
any one can do anything with and I would usually prefer something that
k
Hi Francesco,
Thanks for raising this. I think it is important to consider the
difference between interacting with GOK keys, and interacting directly
with the interface. Here's some reasons I can see for leaving ui
grabbing enabled for the direct selection access method.
* GOK keys can be bigger
Congratulations, Peter. This is a major achievement. The next three and
a half years should be very exciting.
Regards,
Bertil Smark Nilsson
___
gnome-accessibility-list mailing list
gnome-accessibility-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/lis
Hello,
I am wondering the following about the direct selection mode of gok:
Based on the assumption that the direct selection mode is intended for
users that are able to control the pointer, what is the sense of making
gok grab the user interface in this mode?
In fact, if the user can contr
Yes, that's what I meant. I ask because it would be nice if they were
licensed under one of the Creative Commons licenses, so that re-use is
simple and viral.
Thanks.
Fernando
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 17, 2008 6:57 PM
T
Thanks Brian, I see a lot of the CC BY-SA and it seems the closest to
Open Source copyleft for non-software. BY looks closest to a liberal,
BSD style licence. PD means you effectively waive all copyright and
any one can do anything with and I would usually prefer something that
keeps works in the p
Willie:
I'm assuming you're talking about
http://master.gnome.org/~wwalker/demos. I actually didn't think about
licensing, though they should be Copyright 2008 Sun Microsystems, Inc.
I'm not sure what the license-du-jour is these days. I'll ask around.
I'd recommend this license:
Public
