Thoughts on testing and outreach

Hi, I think a few stuff were left in the air about the huge testing challenge we face, and how to put the outreach program to play in that direction. I would like to organize a few of my own thoughts, and get other people's opinions on this. I'm not appending this to the existing thread in desktop

Re: Thoughts on magnification

Hi Willie, Good summary, and I love your name (CIMSITY). From my imperfect vantage point, the only thing I would suggest changing in your summary is the priority of Metacity vs. Compiz in our magnification API ordering. I think we have with gnome-mag a tool that will work with COMPOSITE & Me

Re: Thoughts on speech

Hi Jan, Jan Buchal wrote: >> "WW" == Willie Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> > > WW> Hi All: Great IRC meeting yesterday. Thanks everyone for > WW> attending and participating. Here's some notes I took regarding > WW> speech: > > WW> * While it may not be

Re: Thoughts on magnification

Hi Will, Willie Walker wrote: > Hi All: > > This is to follow up on the nice IRC discussion we had in IRC yesterday > regarding magnification. I think the main points were: > > o The COMPOSITE extension opens the world for us to do lots and lots of > really cool manipulation of what's being dis

Re: Thoughts on speech

> "WW" == Willie Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: WW> Hi All: Great IRC meeting yesterday. Thanks everyone for WW> attending and participating. Here's some notes I took regarding WW> speech: WW> * While it may not be the pristine perfect solution, Speech WW> Dispatcher s

Thoughts on magnification

Hi All: This is to follow up on the nice IRC discussion we had in IRC yesterday regarding magnification. I think the main points were: o The COMPOSITE extension opens the world for us to do lots and lots of really cool manipulation of what's being displayed on the desktop. This goes well bey

Thoughts on speech

Hi All: Great IRC meeting yesterday. Thanks everyone for attending and participating. Here's some notes I took regarding speech: * While it may not be the pristine perfect solution, Speech Dispatcher seems to fit nicely into the overall requirements we need as a larger community. * Speech D

Re: Quick notes on the mechanics of the AT-SPI infrastructure

On 22/02/2008, David Bolter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks for sharing. I wish I'd made my notes public over the years... > especially since I tend to lose them. I think it is a great idea to get > this stuff on the wiki. Thanks again. +1 That's what wikis are for. We can refactor later

No prefix in email subject

Unlike other mailing lists, I noticed that gnome-accessibility doesn't have a prefix in its subject line identifying the mailing list source. For example, Orca has [orca-list]. This makes it harder for me to sort out my emails and focus on the most important ones. Obviously, gnome-accessibility-l

Re: Quick notes on the mechanics of the AT-SPI infrastructure

Will, Thanks for sharing. I wish I'd made my notes public over the years... especially since I tend to lose them. I think it is a great idea to get this stuff on the wiki. Thanks again. cheers, David Willie Walker wrote: > Hey All: > > Well...a few people have queried about how the AT-SPI i

Re: A spotlight on the need for basic reading and writing support in GNOME

Hi Mats: You're definitely very welcome here and it's a pleasure to have you join. Thanks! What I'm hearing from you is the critical need to support users in need of basic reading and writing support. I'm also seeing a couple possible suggestions: 1) write a new assistive technology, and/or

Quick notes on the mechanics of the AT-SPI infrastructure

Hey All: Well...a few people have queried about how the AT-SPI infrastructure gets going, and I also needed to trace down a bug yesterday. So, I took some notes and wrote them up under a "Quick Notes on the Infrastructure Mechanics" section at this page: http://live.gnome.org/Accessibility

Ang: Re: Re: A spotlight on the need for basic reading and writing support in GNOME

[EMAIL PROTECTED] skrev: -On 22/02/2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> 4) What are the minimal writing support that needs implementing?> I think this is indicated in my points about Orca:[snip]ah, so basic writing support is really reading back what has just been written?This in

Re: Re: A spotlight on the need for basic reading and writing support in GNOME

On 22/02/2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 4) What are the minimal writing support that needs implementing? > I think this is indicated in my points about Orca: [snip] ah, so basic writing support is really reading back what has just been written? This in addition to spelling/pr