Re: GNOME A11y: where do we need to improve? (Want input by 25-Jan)

2008-01-25 Thread Willie Walker
Hi All: I just want to send out a note of thanks to everyone who contributed their input as well as those who added details to the http://live.gnome.org/Accessibility/GetInvolved WIKI page. Francesco, your additions to the page were especially good. David Bolter and I are going to review both

Re: GNOME A11y: where do we need to improve? (Want input by 25-Jan)

2008-01-25 Thread Steve Lee
On 17/01/2008, Willie Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > One of the most important things for us to do right now is identify > where we need to improve. > > Over the coming week, please set aside some time to look at > http://live.gnome.org/Accessibility/GetInvolved. Thanks for getting us focused

Re: GNOME A11y: where do we need to improve? (Want input by 25-Jan)

2008-01-25 Thread Steve Lee
On 24/01/2008, Ian Pascoe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > B. Ensure that the apps utilise a widgets library that supports AT-SPI. GTK+ is very popular and it uses GAIL to automatically expose AT-SPI for stock widgets. So it is important for application developers to carefully consider the case for c

Re: GNOME A11y: where do we need to improve? (Want input by 25-Jan)

2008-01-25 Thread Luke Yelavich
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I originally sent this directly to Willie, but I think it wouldn't hurt to also send it to this list. On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 03:23:36PM GMT, Willie Walker wrote: > Hi All: > > I've seen some good activity on the WIKI (thanks!). I also need your >

Re: GNOME A11y: where do we need to improve? (Want input by 25-Jan)

2008-01-25 Thread Steve Lee
On 24/01/2008, Francesco Fumanti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I just read a bit in the OSK-ng, on the LSR list,... and I find the > idea of a modular approach very interesting. But don't expect from > end-users to work with scripts; he should rather be present with an > architecture similar to plug