GNOME A11y: where do we need to improve? (Want input by 25-Jan)

2008-01-24 Thread Ian Pascoe
Will Couple of thoughts. Firstly, to ensure that the commonly shipped basic Gnome apps that appears on base distros all have accessability enabled as fully as possible. Maybe a two stage process: A. Ensure that keyboard shortcuts are activated and supported - is there such a thing as a Gnome s

Re: GNOME A11y: where do we need to improve? (Want input by 25-Jan)

2008-01-24 Thread Francesco Fumanti
Hello, At 9:43 AM + 1/24/08, Steve Lee wrote: >Actually we want to ensure that *all* user a11y needs are covered well >and you've identified a gap. I also see it as a part of a the need to >polish up 'alternative access' provision. The time is ripe for a good >discussion. We did set up the OS

Re: GNOME A11y: where do we need to improve? (Want input by 25-Jan)

2008-01-24 Thread David Bolter
Hi All, I just wanted to explain my lack on involvement recently. I'm on holiday until mid-February so that I can have quality time with my new baby girl and her 5 year old sister. I'm still very passionate about the new momentum in GNOME a11y. I'll be back. cheers, David Willie Walker wrot

Re: GNOME A11y: where do we need to improve? (Want input by 25-Jan)

2008-01-24 Thread Steve Lee
On 23/01/2008, Francesco Fumanti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Please don't get me wrong: In my previous post quoted below I did not > want to say anything about the importance of the point about "having > an onscreen keyboard that is more efficient for the users that..." > > I only wanted to say th