Re: [g-a-devel] gnome-mag with composite support

2006-09-01 Thread Carlos Eduardo Rodrigues Diogenes
Hi George, I forget to comment in that mail that you need to pass the --ignore-composite=0 option to gnome-mag, because the COMPOSITE extension is not completely finished so it's not activated by default. If you downloaded the tarball that I put in www.gnome.org/~carlosd and you have X11R7.0 I th

[g-a-devel] gnome-mag with composite support

2006-09-01 Thread George Kraft
Carlos, I've downloaded your enhanced gnome-mag with composite and have built it; however, when I run "magnifier --fullscreen", then all I get is a blank screen with the occasional cross-hairs. What should I be seeing? http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-accessibility-devel/2006-August/msg00031

[g-a-devel] gnome-mag with composite support

2006-08-15 Thread Carlos Eduardo Rodrigues Diogenes
Hi All, After a while trying to make gnome-mag works with composite to do full screen magnification I percepted that a lot of bugs where due to the initial implementation that I was doing, i.e., I add a new event handler, like the event handler to care about damage notifications, to manage events

Re: [g-a-devel] gnome-mag with composite support

2006-07-17 Thread Carlos Eduardo Rodrigues Diógenes
On Sun, 2006-07-16 at 17:32 -0300, Carlos Eduardo Rodrigues Diógenes wrote: > I think that the code in damage-client.c is correct and the cursor must > blink in the magnified window, but... The code is correct, but the behavior is not the expected, because I'm updating the screen in each DamageNot

Re: [g-a-devel] gnome-mag with composite support

2006-07-17 Thread Carlos Eduardo Rodrigues Diógenes
On Mon, 2006-07-17 at 14:03 +0100, Bill Haneman wrote: > On Mon, 2006-07-17 at 13:38, Carlos Eduardo Rodrigues Diógenes wrote: > > > > By the way, do you run it? Any feedback??? > > I can't build it, even after hacking configure.in, since it depends on > some quite new stuff like ShapeInput, whic

Re: [g-a-devel] gnome-mag with composite support

2006-07-17 Thread Bill Haneman
On Mon, 2006-07-17 at 13:38, Carlos Eduardo Rodrigues Diógenes wrote: > > By the way, do you run it? Any feedback??? I can't build it, even after hacking configure.in, since it depends on some quite new stuff like ShapeInput, which I don't have (though I have Damage, XFixes, and Composite). Bill

Re: [g-a-devel] gnome-mag with composite support

2006-07-17 Thread Carlos Eduardo Rodrigues Diógenes
On Mon, 2006-07-17 at 11:52 +0100, Bill Haneman wrote: > Hi Carlos: > > The configure.in checks for the X libraries are not correct - they will > fail on many platforms. Why did you not use the ones already in > gnome-mag cvs? This is only for tests. This was the easiest way that I find to get i

Re: [g-a-devel] gnome-mag with composite support

2006-07-17 Thread Bill Haneman
Hi Carlos: The configure.in checks for the X libraries are not correct - they will fail on many platforms. Why did you not use the ones already in gnome-mag cvs? Bill On Sun, 2006-07-16 at 21:32, Carlos Eduardo Rodrigues Diógenes wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to make gnome-mag work with composit

[g-a-devel] gnome-mag with composite support

2006-07-16 Thread Carlos Eduardo Rodrigues Diógenes
Hi, I'm trying to make gnome-mag work with composite support, but I'm having a strange behavior that I don't understand at all. I don't know if this is only a problem in my machine, so if other can play with it, please give me any feedback. run the configure script and enter in the magnifier fold