Hi Michael and Mark,
On δΊ”, 2007-12-14 at 17:00 +, Michael Meeks wrote:
> > I'm sure we could go the Bonobo route and have a base class that was
> > reference counted, but we really don't want to.
>
> Quite - me neither ;-) OTOH, it's a hard issue to fix: and
> precedent-wise, MSAA, I
Thanks Willie, this is pretty helpful :)
Willie Walker wrote:
> Hi All:
>
> I still need to catch up on all this mail. It's all good stuff, and I'm
> excited to see intelligent and cooperative conversation going on. In
> the meantime...
>
>>> Having said that, it'd be great to build an und
Steve Lee wrote:
> On 17/12/2007, Willie Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> o Look at the role of the event source. Passing this along in the event
>> would prevent a round trip.
>
> Doesn't the EventDetails expansion cover this? It appears to be
> optional if the toolkit supplies but potential
On 17/12/2007, Willie Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> o Look at the role of the event source. Passing this along in the event
> would prevent a round trip.
Doesn't the EventDetails expansion cover this? It appears to be
optional if the toolkit supplies but potentially the infrastructure
could
Hi All:
I still need to catch up on all this mail. It's all good stuff, and I'm
excited to see intelligent and cooperative conversation going on. In
the meantime...
>> Having said that, it'd be great to build an understanding of what
>> people do synchronously during event emission & can
Michael Meeks wrote:
> Hi Steve,
>
> On Fri, 2007-12-14 at 18:23 +, Steve Lee wrote:
>> plus I was getting almost continuous desktop lockups (and forget
>> using a debugger).
>
> Heh ;-) sure, from my at-poke days I recall a load of methods that
> simply couldn't be called during event
Hi Steve,
On Fri, 2007-12-14 at 18:23 +, Steve Lee wrote:
> plus I was getting almost continuous desktop lockups (and forget
> using a debugger).
Heh ;-) sure, from my at-poke days I recall a load of methods that
simply couldn't be called during event emission for various tangled
reas
