[gmx-users] principal component analysis

Dear all gmx users I would like to calculate pc loadings for various integrated factors in the form of following sample table: Integrated factorsPC1PC2PC3 PC4PC5PC6PC7PC8 PC9PC10Total nonpolar surface area0.60 -0.07-0.76-0.11-0.060.11 0.05-0.160.06-0.02Chain exposed area 0.92 -0.14-0.050.12 0.230.

[gmx-users] principal component analysis

Dear all users I would like to calculate pc loadings for various integrated factors in the form of following sample table: Integrated Factors PC1 PC2 PC3 PC4 PC5 PC6 PC7 PC8 PC9 PC10 Total non polar surface area 0.60 -0.07 -0.76 -0.11 0.08 0.05 -0.16 0.08 -0.01 0.02 Native

[gmx-users] parallel simulation

I would like to run one simulation in parallel so that it utilises all the available nodes and cores. For that, I have compiled gromacs with mpi enabled and also installed openmpi on my machine. I am using the following command: mpirun -np 4 mdrun_mpi -v -s *.tpr When i use top command, I get: PI

[gmx-users] Re: parallel simulation

To add : I am running simulations on institute cluster with 8 nodes (2 cores each). Please suggest me the way so that I can run one simulation on all available nodes, cores and threads. Thanks in advance. On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 1:55 PM, pratibha kapoor wrote: > I would like to run

[gmx-users] g_sham

Dear all gromacs users I am creating free energy landscape using g_sham but my axis are not getting labelled. I have searched the archive and found that using xmin and xmax options we can label them. I have first created my 2D projection xvg file using g_anaeig -f *.xtc -s *.tpr -first 1 -last 2 -

[gmx-users] parallelization

Dear gromacs users I would like to run my simulations on all nodes(8) with full utilisation of all cores(2 each). I have compiled gromacs version 4.6.3 using both thread mpi and open mpi. I am using following command: mpirun -np 8 mdrun_mpi -v -s -nt 2 -s *.tpr -c *.gro But I am getting following

[gmx-users] choosing force field

Dear all I would like to carry out unfolding simulations of my dimeric protein and would like to know which is the better force field to work with out of gromos 96 43 or 53? Also, is gromos 96 43a1 force field redundant? When I searched the previous archive, I could see similar question was raised