Hi all,
I want to carry out a MD simulation of a receptor protein in presence of
ATP molecule. ATP is included in .rtp file of ffG43a1 force field. but post
pdb2gmx, .pdb output file does not show crds of ATP. Does it mean that ATP is
not recognized as a residue of protein in spite of
From: Mark Abraham
To: Discussion list for GROMACS users
Sent: Monday, 22 June, 2009 10:27:24 AM
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] simulation of protein in presence of ATP
nikhil damle wrote:
> Hi all,
> I want to carry out a MD simulation of a receptor protein in presence
> of A
Discussion list for GROMACS users
Sent: Tuesday, 23 June, 2009 11:16:26 AM
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] simulation of protein in presence of ATP
nikhil damle wrote:
> Hi,
>
>Thanks a lot for the reply. I am submitting ATP crds as ATP.pdb to pdb2gmx
> and receive the error as "
problem or writing things in
improper order ?
Nikhil
From: Mark Abraham
To: Discussion list for GROMACS users
Sent: Tuesday, 23 June, 2009 12:35:12 PM
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] simulation of protein in presence of ATP
nikhil damle wrote:
> Hi,
>
?
From: Justin A. Lemkul
To: Discussion list for GROMACS users
Sent: Tuesday, 23 June, 2009 4:41:22 PM
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] simulation of protein in presence of ATP
nikhil damle wrote:
> Thanks a lot for kind help. I reached till grompp before minimizing energy of
> the system w
?
Regards,
Nikhil
From: Mark Abraham
To: Discussion list for GROMACS users
Sent: Tuesday, 23 June, 2009 9:10:15 PM
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] simulation of protein in presence of ATP
nikhil damle wrote:
> OK till here done ! the pdb file generated for EM sh
dynamics on my
ATP-receptor complex system ?
Regards,
Nikhil
From: Mark Abraham
To: Discussion list for GROMACS users
Sent: Tuesday, 23 June, 2009 12:35:12 PM
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] simulation of protein in presence of ATP
nikhil damle wrote:
>
Hi all,
Thanks a lot for the help extended to me through gmx-users' archives.
Regards,
Nikhil
Looking for local information? Find it on Yahoo! Local
http://in.local.yahoo.com/___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gro
Hi,
What are the units of RMSD (nm or ang) in which g_rms calculates the RMSD
between two structures ?
Regards,
Nikhl
Send free SMS to your Friends on Mobile from your Yahoo! Messenger. Download
Now! http://messenger.yahoo.com/download.php___
gmx-use
Thanks a lot for the help.
Regards,
Nikhil
From: Justin A. Lemkul
To: Discussion list for GROMACS users
Sent: Monday, 13 July, 2009 5:22:06 PM
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] query regarding g_rms
nikhil damle wrote:
> Hi,
> What are the units of RMSD (nm
I am carrying out energy minimization of the protein peptide complex. But even
after using nstcomm=1 and/or pbc=xyz, my energy minimized structure has peptide
far away from the binding site. This did not happen with ATP-protein complex.
Even in Drug-enzyme tutorial, similar .mdp file is given fo
From: Mark Abraham
To: Discussion list for GROMACS users
Sent: Tuesday, 14 July, 2009 12:07:24 PM
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Hello
nikhil damle wrote:
> I am carrying out energy minimization of the protein peptide complex. But
> even after using nstcomm=1
uld have peptide
displaced ?
Regards,
Nikhil
From: Mark Abraham
To: Discussion list for GROMACS users
Sent: Tuesday, 14 July, 2009 12:28:05 PM
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Hello
nikhil damle wrote:
> I am turning pbc =xyz as written in earlier correspondence.
Hello,
When I am running energy minimisation of protein-peptide complex, minimised
structure shows a space for the protein in water box; but peptide remains
inside the box while protein is seen outside.
Same occurs when I keep pbc = xyz and/or nstcomm = 1
in .top file, I am including individua
Hi,
Can anyone suggest me where to get phosphorylated ser and threonine parameters ?
Regards,
Nikhil
Looking for local information? Find it on Yahoo! Local
http://in.local.yahoo.com/___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://li
and serine
nikhil damle wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can anyone suggest me where to get phosphorylated ser and threonine
> parameters ?
>
The ffG43a1p tarball is available under User Contributions on the Gromacs
website:
http://www.gromacs.org/index.php?title=Download_%
Hi,
I added peptide H to the the new residue i added to .rtp file in the
ffG43a1.hdb file But the pdb2gmx gives error saying it can not read hdb file.
If i remove this H from .hdb file, it gives error of missing atom. How should i
resolve this problem ? y can pdb2gmx not read hdb file if i add o
PM
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] H-Db error
nikhil damle wrote:
> Hi,
> I added peptide H to the the new residue i added to .rtp file in the
> ffG43a1.hdb file But the pdb2gmx gives error saying it can not read hdb file.
> If i remove this H from .hdb file, it gives error of missing atom
3a1
---
From: Justin A. Lemkul
To: Discussion list for GROMACS users
Sent: Sunday, 19 July, 2009 5:14:35 PM
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] H-Db error
nikhil damle wrote:
> Hello,
> Thanks for the reply. I am trying to add N-H hydrogen of a residue which is
> t
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] H-Db error
nikhil damle wrote:
> This is how i have modified the entry as i myself created the parameter file
> for phosphothreonine. This is normal NH hydrogen n no extra added=>directly
> copied from threonine. So y there is an error msg ? i added thi
Hello,
Where will I get Phosphothreonine parameters ? I have tried to incorporate
gamma-Phosphate parameters from ATP in the threonine residue but in vain.
regards,
Nikhil
See the Web's breaking stories, chosen by people like you. Check out
Yahoo! Buzz. http://in.buzz.yahoo.com/___
Hello,
Where
will I get Phosphothreonine parameters ? I have tried to incorporate
gamma-Phosphate parameters from ATP in the threonine residue but in
vain.
regards,
Nikhil
Love Cricket? Check out live scores, photos, video highlights and more.
Click here http://cricket.yahoo.com___
phosphothreonine parameters
nikhil damle wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Where will I get Phosphothreonine parameters ? I have tried to incorporate
> gamma-Phosphate parameters from ATP in the threonine residue but in vain.
>
The answer for parameterization is always the same:
http://o
Hi all,
I am facing the problem while calculating backbone RMSD over 30 ns. upto
~6-7 ns g_rms gives correct RMSDs and later all RMSD values are unexpectedly
and unusually high (within 20 ps RMSD value shoots up by ~8A). But when i
calculate RMSD using g_confrms programme, it gives me expe
Hi,
I am simulating a protein system and willing to compute rmsd over entire
trajectory wrt a starting crystal structure. i use g_rms programme for this
purpose starting from 0th frame until last frame of time. But rmsd shows
abnormal spikes between successive time-frames. Height of spike
Yes. I am correcting the trajectory for periodicity
Regards,
Nikhil
From: Justin A. Lemkul
To: Discussion list for GROMACS users
Sent: Wednesday, 23 September, 2009 3:48:47 PM
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Probelm of g_rms
nikhil damle wrote:
> Hi
Hi,
I am trying to simulate a dimeric structure and I have already simulated its
monomeric form. I use exactly same parameters which i use for monomer during
dimer minimisation in solvent.
System Details:
# Atoms = 4488 (# Res = 582)
octahedron box with d = 0.9
Solvent (spce water model) dens
Hi,
I am trying to simulate a dimeric structure and I have already simulated its
monomeric form. I use exactly same parameters which i use for monomer during
dimer minimisation in solvent.
System Details:
# Atoms = 4488 (# Res = 582)
octahedron box with d = 0.9
Solvent (spce water model) den
Hi all
I am trying to simulate a system of 3168 atoms in vacuum in PBC box
(-d=0.9 nm). Since there are no solvent molecules, i am unable to neutralise
the system using addition of ions (Hence system has +3 charge). As soon as i
start the MD run after putting the whole system in box, t
ance and Y size error
nikhil damle wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I am trying to simulate a system of 3168 atoms in vacuum in PBC box
> (-d=0.9 nm). Since there are no solvent molecules, i am unable to neutralise
> the system using addition of ions (Hence system has +3 charge). As
GROMACS users
Sent: Thu, 8 October, 2009 12:46:56 PM
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Load imbalance and Y size error
nikhil damle wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tried to run on single node now. Now the error is different saying
> "One of the box vectors has become shorter than twice the cut-off le
lowed cell
size(2.00)"
What possibly could be the reason ?
Regards,
Nikhil
____
From: nikhil damle
To: Discussion list for GROMACS users
Sent: Thu, 8 October, 2009 2:10:04 PM
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Load imbalance and Y size error
No. My system is a sing
Hi,
I am trying to run a vacuum simulation of a system associated with ATP and
peptide. Being vacuum MD i removed pressure coupling and included plain
electrostatic cut-offs while calculating potential. Energy minimisation
converged to machine precesion even though not upto the specified cut-of
ikhil
From: Justin A. Lemkul
To: Discussion list for GROMACS users
Sent: Sun, 11 October, 2009 4:20:58 PM
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] domain decomposition error
nikhil damle wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to run a vacuum simulation of a system associated with ATP and
&g
Hi,
I wanted to inquire about the vacuum FF distributed officially with
GROMACS-4.0.5. I wish to carry out a vacuum MD of ~300 aa protein
FF.dat file mentions of G43b1 as officially distributed vacuum FF. But there
are no FF related files-.rtp,.hdb etc present. Is that the case that GROMACS-4
Hi,
I have applied distance restraints on my system during MD simulation through
following options:
"disre = simple" and disre_fc = 2000 in .mdp file.
Now i wish to see the energy term corresponding to these restraints in
principle to be written in .edr file. But g_energy programme does not list
rms
nikhil damle wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have applied distance restraints on my system during MD simulation through
> following options:
> "disre = simple" and disre_fc = 2000 in .mdp file.
> Now i wish to see the energy term corresponding to these restraints in
> princip
equal for both
pairs.
Am I understanding correctly ?
Regards,
Nikhil
From: nikhil damle
To: jalem...@vt.edu; Discussion list for GROMACS users
Sent: Mon, 8 February, 2010 10:14:10 AM
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Distance restraint energy terms
I have already
Dear all ,
I am trying to run energy minimisation of a modified PDB file (part of ATOM
block copy-pasted in dummy.pdb file)
it has number of missing atoms (in the original pdb file itself) . hence the
.top file is created with option "-missing".
as it has charge of -2, i have added 2 Na+ ions
Hi Vinod,
How did you build your top file for input to grompp ? genconf would have given
you a multiplied system in .gro structure format. I think you should generate
.top file from this .gro file using pdb2gmx and then use that as grompp input.
Regards,
Nikhil
_
Hi All,
I am trying to simulate kinase domain (chain A) in complex with cyclin (chain
B). During solvent dynamics, PBC on and PME treatment of electrostatics, i need
to keep only kinase domain flexible but cyclin fixed.
i put POSRES_B in define variable and tried to simulated the entire solvate
Hi All,
I am trying to simulate kinase domain (chain A) in complex with cyclin (chain
B). During solvent dynamics, PBC on and PME treatment of electrostatics, i need
to keep only kinase domain flexible but cyclin fixed.
i put POSRES_B in define variable and tried to simulated the entire solvat
Hey !
My doubt posted few days back still holds. I am trying to simulate the kinase
domain in complex with cyclin. when i keep entire complex either position
restrained or flexible, MD runs without any errors. But as soon as i keep
cyclin position restrained keeping kinase domain flexible, it g
43 matches
Mail list logo