Dear GMXers,
I'm running umbrella PMF calculations using GROMACS 4.5. A molecule is
placed at various locations of a channel to compute the energy barrier of
the entrance.
Below is the PMF section of mdp input, to compute the PMF around the
position of (4.04700, 4.0582, -2.2058). The pulling mole
Dear GMXers,
I'm trying to compute the PMF of a molecule along the centerline of a
nanotube (the axial direction of the nanotube is parallel to the z axis).
The nanotube is used as the reference group and the molecule as the pulling
group.
pull_geometry = position
pull_dim= Y Y Y
pull_s
Dear GMXers,
Is there a way in GROMACS to include quadrupole-charge interaction?
Or is there a standard to way to mimic quadrupole moment using partial
charge?
Thank you.
Best,
Yanbin
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please s
are implicit whenever you have a molecule withe
> more than two partial charges. You don't have to include it explicitly.
> There are, however, multipole expansion techniques to speed up
> electrostatics calculations, but that's another story.
>
> Erik
>
> 15 jun 2011
Dear GMXers,
I'm trying to implementing a flexible water model in "Gordillo, M.C.; Marti,
J. *J. Phys.: Condens. Matter* *2010*, *22*, 284111" using GROMACS.
The intra-molecular water potential has the following form:
V=D{[1-exp(-alpha*r1)]^2 + [1-exp(-alpha*r1)]^2} + k_a /2 *r3^2 +
k_a*r3*(r1+r2
Dear GMXers,
I'm computing the liquid-vapor surface tension for SPC/E water using
GROMACS 4.5.3.
The initial water box dimension is 3nm*3nm*3nm, containing 1807 water
molecules, which is extended in z direction to a length of 12nm, to create
two liquid-vapor interfaces. The ensemble is NVT.
The sy
Dear GMXers,
I'm trying to compute the surface tension between water and graphite
surface, using the C-O interaction parameters as in Werder et. al. J. Phys.
Chem. B 2003. The expected contact angle, based on Young's equation, is 86
degrees (as reported in Werder's paper by droplet method). The SP
Dear GMXers,
I'm running a simulation of water contact angle measurement on top of
graphite surface.
Initially a water cubic box is placed on two-layer graphite surface with the
rest of the box being vacuum. The water droplet is relaxed during the
simulation to develop a spherical shape.
An error
mposition cell of their charge group"
> To: Discussion list for GROMACS users
> Message-ID: <4cf73b92.40...@anu.edu.au>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> On 2/12/2010 4:16 PM, WU Yanbin wrote:
> > Dear GMXers,
> >
> > I
Dear GMXers,
I'm simulating a SPC/E water box with the size of 4nm by 4nm by 4nm. The
command "g_tune_pme" was used to find the optimal PME node numbers, Coulomb
cutoff radius and grid spacing size.
The following command is used:
g_tune_pme -np 24 -steps 5000 -resetstep 500 ...
rcoul=1.5nm, rvdw=
Dear GMXers,
I would like to reproduce the water droplet contact angle on graphite
surface, as in Werder, T.; Walther, J. H.; Halicioglu, T.; Koumoutsakos, P.
*J. Phys. Chem. B* *2003*, *107*, 1345-1352.
The box size is 20nm by 20nm by 30nm. Graphite is represented by a two-layer
carbon sheet. Af
Hi, all,
According to Manual v3.3, "It's possible to apply multiple bonded
interactions of the same type on the same atoms" [12th line of Page 98].
If a dihedral potential for 4 neighboring atoms is defined 3 times using the
"periodic type" in the topology file, like
V=k1*(1+cos(phi-phi_s1))
V=k2*
is calculated as mass/tau_t.)
Does it influence my NVE simulation? Any method to turn the Langevin
Dynamics off? Thanks.
Yours
Sincerely,
WU Yanbin
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users
advance.
Yours Sincerely,
WU Yanbin
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http
O does noe exist in GROMOS force
field. And GROMOS manual can not be downloaded for free. Where can I find
description for each atom type in GROMOS? Any suggestions? Thanks in
advance.
Yours Sincerely,
dvance.
Yours Sincerely,
WU Yanbin
--
Message: 4
Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 09:14:22 +1000
From: Mark Abraham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Calculate individual force betwe
is LJ (SR)
Then is this topology OK? or I need other modifications?
Thanks in advance.
Yours Sincerely,
Hi, Everybody,
And I found that if this simulation is on gromacs3.3, the warning becomes
error.
Yours
Sincerely,
WU Yanbin
Message: 7
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 21:35:42 -0500
From: "WU Yanbin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sub
Hi, David,
Then it will be quite slow compared if I used the LJ or Buckingham
function, right?
Yours
Sincerely,
WU Yanbin
--
Message: 6
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 08:21:36 +0200
From: David van der Spoel
Hi, David,
Then it will be quite slow using potential table compared if I used the LJ
or Buckingham function, right?
Yours Sincerely,
WU Yanbin
--
Message: 6
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007
.
Yours Sincerely,
WU
Yanbin
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Yours Sincerely,
WU Yanbin
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don&
[ pairtypes ], the item in
[ pairs ] would be removed?
(2) "shuffle": Is it compulsory for parallel running? I read from the
manual that it's a must.
Thanks in advance.
Yours Sincerely,
WU Yanbin
_
erely,
WU Yanbin
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don'
Sincerely,
WU Yanbin
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please don't post (un)subscribe reques
;mdrun"? Thanks.
Yours Sincerely,
26 matches
Mail list logo