[gmx-users] qm mm and charges in GMX!

2007-05-24 Thread Samuel Silva Pita
Hi GMX'ers, i've been reading some publications about QM MM calculatiosn intending to aplly this in my system. Since I'd read the GMX Manual and I have some doubts about this recent implemetationat the program. I'd compile the gromacs with MOPAC 2007 and when I tried to simulate at hybrid lev

Re: [gmx-users] qm mm and charges in GMX!

2007-05-25 Thread Samuel Silva Pita
Hi GMX'ers- specially Mark Abraham, At the GROMACS compiled with MOPAC 7.0, I tried to simulate my drug, using the QM/MM, at two *.itp files: (a) At the first I put the CHELPG charge fitting. (b) At the second itp file, I put zero charge since all the quantical or semi-empirical methods compu

[gmx-users] Two doubts about GMX!

2006-06-05 Thread Samuel Silva Pita
Hi, GMXers, i've some doubts about the use of GMX and implicit solvent models. I have an huge system ( moreless 10 000 protein atoms) and trying to do MD using explicit solvents but my computer limitations doesn't work very well. 1) someone could help me giving some light in how can i simulate my

[gmx-users] Toplogy file FAD and ADP!

2006-08-01 Thread Samuel Silva Pita
Dear Gmxers, i've trying to develop the topology files for FAD and ADP since the GMX 3.3.1 does not have this molecules. Does someone do it before? I know that FFGMX has one topology of FAD but are the parameters similar for FF53a61 in GMX 3.3.1? Thanks in advance. Samuel Pita. "Do not wear your

[gmx-users] Topolgy file FAD and ADP!

2006-08-01 Thread Samuel Silva Pita
Dear Gmxers, i've trying to develop the topology files for FAD and ADP since the GMX 3.31 odes not have this molecules. Does someone it before? I know that FFGMX has one topology of FAD but are the parameters similar for FF53a61 in GMX 3.3.1? Thanks in advance. Samuel Pita. "Do not wear yourself

[gmx-users] Variable ci problem!

2006-08-02 Thread Samuel Silva Pita
Dear GMXers, I had built my molecular topology "by hand" an when I was minimisate the energy of my system gromacs 3.3.1 give this error message: "Steepest Descents: Tolerance (Fmax) = 1.0e+01 Number of steps=1 Step=0, Dmax= 1.0e-02 nm, Epot= -6.12087e+04 Fmax= 1.8

[gmx-users] Variable ci problem!

2006-08-02 Thread Samuel Silva Pita
Dear GMXers, I had built my molecular topology "by hand" an when I was minimisate the energy of my system gromacs 3.3.1 give this error message: "Steepest Descents: Tolerance (Fmax) = 1.0e+01 Number of steps=1 Step=0, Dmax= 1.0e-02 nm, Epot= -6.12087e+04 Fmax= 1.8

[gmx-users] Variable ci yet!

2006-08-09 Thread Samuel Silva Pita
Hi all, my problem in my "by hand' topology remains until now but the errors in atoms of solvent added through genbox command at GMX 3.3.1 disappeared. Unfortnately the variable ci is giving me some headaches and because this I cannot do my topology. Can someone help me in this type of problem?

[gmx-users] name of molecules at rtp archives!

2006-10-04 Thread Samuel Silva Pita
Hi GMXers, how can I find the names of the molecules that are represented at rtp archives? I'd tried to see at aminoacids.dat and at *bond.itp but I cannot find the names. For example: ETH, BA, ETHH, RTOL. Which molecules are these? thanks, Samuel Pita. "Do not wear yourself out to get rich;do