Dear all,
I use x2top to get topology of a capped carbon nanotube with 168 atoms
using oplsaa force field. The output information about dihedreals shows
as follows.
Before cleaning: 1008 dihedrals
There are 252 Ryckaert-Bellemans dihedrals, 0 impropers
Using my own code, I also get 100
Dear all,
Sorry that I have to post this message similar to one posted several
days ago, for I have spent much time on thinking about it but still have
not got a credible explanation.
I use x2top to get topology of a capped carbon nanotube with 168 atoms
using oplsaa force field. The output
Dear all,
Nobody would like to give some clues for this question, even the
developer of the x2top code?
I use x2top to get topology of a capped carbon nanotube with 168 atoms
using oplsaa force field. The output information about dihedreals shows
as follows.
Before cleaning: 1008 dihedrals
T
>x2top -h
>Did you use the -alldih flag? For OPLS like force field all dihedrals
are need, for gromos like ff only one dihedral per bond is kept, that is
>why.
Thanks, David. I did not use -alldih. After I used it, four dihedrals
for one bond are all kept. Anyway I have got this point about th
Dear all,
I want to make an ideal semipermeable membrane comprised of several
hundreds of atom CM in a plane, which is fully permeable to water but
resistant to NaCl. I defined atomtype CM (CM is neutral)
[ atomtypes ]
CM 6 12.01 0.000 A 2.22343e-03 3.434770e-06
In orde
I suggest you first can run a system with only polymer solution in NPT
ensemble. After a suitable density is reached, then you can add two
graphite sheets into the equilibrated system, please set the distance
between graphite and solution carefully (or trial error).
Best wishes,
Zhongqiao
Hi,
Hi, have you set comm-mode = None? If no, you can set it and try again.
Zhongqiao Hu
Dept of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering
National University of Singpore
>Hello,
>I want to simulate a rigid plate (wall) moving along one direction and
>reflecting all the particles it meets
I am not sure if it works. You can try to put your system into two
frozen layers which will exert a resisting force on the wall. You still
need to put an acceleration on the wall. But after a steady state is
reached, you will see the wall will move approximately at a constant
velocity.
Best wis
Dear all,
I wonder if the drift velocity has been removed from calculating the
temperature for a non-equilibrium MD in which a directional movement for
a group exists due to external force applied.
One paper, entitled "Why are carbon nanotubes fast transporters of
water?" (Joseph and Aluru
>> I wonder if the drift velocity has been removed from calculating the
>> temperature for a non-equilibrium MD in which a directional movement
for
>> a group exists due to external force applied.
> Yes it is. Please check the source code in src/mdlib/update.c
Thanks, David.
Then h
Dear all,
When I run equilibrium MD simulation, I did not do anything for COM
removal in .mdp file. So by default, the linear motion of COM of the
whole system should be removed. In this case, the MSD calculated by
g_msd should be different from that otherwise. So one needs to set
comm_mode = n
Dear all,
I wonder if a negative Phe molecule is parametrized in gromos96 FF
properly. I used
pdb2gmx -f phe.pdb -o phe.gro -p phe.top -ter
I selected "1: NH2" for N-terminus and "0: COO-" for C-terminus. But the
phe.top obtained is not correct
[ atoms ]
; nr type resnr
Dear all,
I only know in gromacs one can put external force on a group of atom. Now I
want to put an external force on atoms in a specific region. For instance, say,
the box size in z direction is 10 nm, I want to put force on all atoms in
region from z = 4 nm to z = 6 nm during whole simulatio
Dear gromacs developers,
As far as I know, in the latest gromacs version, one only can put an external
force on a group of atoms, but can not put external force on atoms in a
specific region, for instance, the region from z = 4 nm to z = 6 nm. Some other
softwares like NAMD seem to have such fu
Hi,
I have been thinking how to write a Fortran program to read xtc file for
a long time. The gmx homepage provides a code testxtc.
But when I simply compile it, some errors are shown as follows:
/tmp/ifortuDk9ZY.o(.text+0x5c): In function `MAIN__':
: undefined reference to `xdrfopen_'
/tmp/i
>Install gromacs. Then check that $(GMXHOME)/lib/$(CPU)/libxtfc.whatever
>exists.
>Mark
Dear Mark,
The gmx has been installed in our cluster. But I can not find any files
related to libxtfc under /lib. That means something is lost during the
installation, right? In this case, are there any ot
Hi,
I faced one problem when reading xtc file.
Assuming my xtc file is run.xtc and the last frame no. is 1 (time
step=1ps, e.g, 10 ns in total), I want to see the coordinates of the
whole system without jump at frame=1, and I used the command:
(1)trjconv -f run.xtc -s run.tpr -o sys_1
Hi, Tsjerk
I see, you are right. I checked the coordinates again. Readxtc can give
correct coordinates without jumps. And it seems that we should be
careful when using trjconv to extract coordinates without jumps.
Zhongqiao
-
I want to simulated transport of D- and L- alanine molecules. First I
tried using ffg43a1 force field, but D-analine will quickly flip to
L-alanine during energy minimization (I dont know why). Alternatively, I
tried oplsaa force fields. That's OK without flip from D- to L-. But one
problem is that
Message-
From: Hu Zhongqiao
Sent: 2007年6月18日 7:03 PM
To: 'gmx-users@gromacs.org'
Subject: RE: non-intergral charge for L-alanine molecules?
Thanks a lot, Mark Abraham and David,
I thought the atom charge of an ALA molecule was same as those in ALA residue
of a protein molecules. Th
Thanks a lot, Mark Abraham and David,
I thought the atom charge of an ALA molecule was same as those in ALA
residue of a protein molecules. That's wrong.
Now I can use pdb2gmx -ter to set zwitterion-type ALA.
About ffG43a1, I want to ask a question which is a little ambiguous to
me.
According to
Dear all,
I find the Lennard-Jones parameter epsilon of Na+ in Gmx is very
different from some references.
In gmx, I calculated sigma(Na+)=0.258nm, epsilon(Na+)=0.0617 kJ/mol
But many researchers cited a paper by Dang LX [J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1995,
117, 6954-6960] and used parameters as follows
Dear Mark
Thanks for your reply.
In more detail, I used ffg43a1 force field. In the file ffG43a1nb.itp,
one can find the Lennard-Jones parameters for Na+ as follows:
C6=7.2063121e-05; and C12= 2.1025e-08
>From these 2 values one can get epsion(Na+)=0.0617 kJ/mol.
Because the force field para
Hi,
Every time I use g_msd to calculate the MSD for one group, this program
always output the diffusion constant like
# D[ SOL] = 0.4996 (+/- 0.0366) (1e-5 cm^2/s)
I know that g_msd calculates the D using the least square (LSQ) method.
But I dont know how to calculate the deviation of D
Thanks a lot. Yes, now I can reproduced this error value according to
this instruction. But I think it is better if g_msd can give standard
deviation using the standard procedure of LSQ, which is used by the MS
Excel function LINEST.
Zhongqiao
> This snippet can be found by g_msd -h or on the
I calculated SASA using g_sas for three proteins with -r and -oa and
found that the atom area for one protein is considerably larger than two
others. I dont know it is due to the nature of different proteins or
something incorrect for the command g_sas itself. And I checked the
mailing list and fou
Hi,
I am using amber force field in Gromacs. The protein I simulated is the
lysozyme (PDBID: 1HEL). I want to set all lysine residues to be neutral.
According to rules using Amber in Gromacs, neutral lysine should be
named to LYN. Everything goes smoothly except the N-terminal lysine
residue. I
unitcharge?
> To: Discussion list for GROMACS users
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> it could not be possible since amber force field doesn't parameterized
> NLYN. alternative, use ACE/NME to cap th
Dear all,
I tried to use
g_energy to calculate potential energy in Gromacs 3.3. But I don't know how to
select after something was displayed as follows:
Select the
terms you want from the following
list-G96Bond
G96An
Dear
all,
I tried to used the
program trjorder (in the version 3.3.1) like this:
trjorder -f xtc_4.xtc -s tpr_4.tpr -n index.ndx
-o ordered.xtc -b 0 -e 10 -r 0.3
But the program
always output nshell.xvg file, without ordered.xtc file. And I also tried
this program in 3.2.1 using the sam
arge to be reasonable. I guess that, from the first frame to
second frame, the molecules with the same labels (r1217, for example) are not
the same molecules because H2O molecules have been reordered. In this case, I
can not figure out how to achieve D.
Any suggesstion are
welcome. Thank you very
Dear
all,
I finish a 10-ns MD
simulations for a system including 16 lysozyme molecule chains, some solvents
H2O molecules and 128 Cl- counter ions under PBC. When I use the command to
calculate the RMSF of residues as follows:
g_rmsf -f ***.xtc -s
***.tpr -o rmsf_res.xvg (I selected 3 f
>
are all the lysozymes treated as one protein? in that case it might be a
PBC artifact. try doing the rmsf per molecule (by running the program
16> times) and then overlaying the
result.
>
are you trying to crystallize it?
>David.
Thank David. I just
found that it was due to jumps i
Hi,
I want to simulate a
Manganese-containing system. But the current gromacs version can not build
topology for Mn. I have checked the mailing list and found some discussion.
But I still can not figure out how to do it. Any experienced persion can
give some clear steps for this? Thanks in
Hi,
all,
I want to simulate a
unit cell of a protein under pbc. The whole system consists of about 100
chains. In original .pdb file, some chain IDs are identical, for example, 'A' is
used for different chains. When I used that file without revision, gmx showed
error like that: Chain iden
Dear
All,
I want to do MD for
a protein crystal containing Mn^2+ ion. Because gromacs has not provided the
force field for Mn^2+ ion, I want simply delete Mn ion and then run
MD. Will this lead any consequences making the MD results
unacceptable? If so, what else should I do instead?
Z
Hi,
I want to add both sodium and potassium to a protein solution. But there
is always error information about potassium after I used genion to add
K(K+) and set right no of molecules at the bottom of .top file:
No such moleculetype K (or K+)
no matter I use K or K+ as potassium name and no m
Hi, Mark, thanks for your reply.
After some efforts I have been successful to insert potassium using ff
oplsaa. But it seems that ff g43a1 actually can not recognize K or K+.
It doesnt matter, anyway I can select ff oplsaa.
Zhongqiao Hu
Lab E5-04-27
Tel: 65161946(O)
Department of Chemical and
Hi, everyone
Can we run a NPT simulation with fixed lengths in x and y direction but
with variable length in z?
Zhongqiao Hu
Lab E5-04-27
Tel: 65161946(O)
Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering
National University of Singapore
117576, Singapore
___
Dear all,
Now I have 3 questions.
1) Do I need to use genbox to add H2O twice?
In the past, I first used genbox to add H2O and then used genion to add
counterion. After that is EM. But now I find, if I use genbox again
after genion or even after EM, there are some additional, though very
few, H
Thanks, Tsjerk
> >1) Do I need to use genbox to add H2O twice?
>> In the past, I first used genbox to add H2O and then used genion to
add
>> counterion. After that is EM. But now I find, if I use genbox again
after
>> genion or even after EM, there are some additional, though very few,
H2O
>> mol
Dear users,
I wonder if I can run Brownian Dynamics in water media using Gmx.
Although I know we can set integrator=bd, I dont know how to set
dielectric constant of water in Gmx parameter file. Anyone could give
some hints for this? thanks
Zhongqiao Hu
Lab E5-04-27
Tel: 65161946(O)
Departmen
for longer time scale. If Gmx can not help, it will be bad.
thanks in advance,
Zhongqiao
Message: 1
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 18:15:10 +0800
From: "Hu Zhongqiao" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [gmx-users] Can I run BD in water media using Gmx?
To:
Message-ID:
<[EMAIL PROTE
Thanks, Mark and Jelger,
To Jelger,
But If one can run BD by setting integrator=sd, how is dielectri
constant of water set in the simulation? On p141 of the Manual v3.3,
there is one option epsilon_r. Does it mean BD can be run successfully
if epsilon_r is set as ca. 78 for water?
zhongqiao
I want to ask a simple question. In gmx v3.3, can one set an alternating
current electric field in the input parameter file?
Thanks
Zhongqiao Hu
Lab E5-04-27
Tel: 65161946(O)
Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering
National University of Singapore
117576, Singapore
___
Dear all,
I am running a MD with a uniform electric field. But the speed is very
slow (estimated 40 days), compared to without electric field ( 7-8
days). I don't think it is reasonable, right. Although an external
electric field will slow down the MD, this large difference is byyond my
expectation
it should not make any difference at all.
are you sure that is the only difference?
run gmxcheck -s1 -s2 to check it.
--
David.
Thanks, David,
Later I found that the real reason was serioulsy heavy load in the
cluster. After it is decresed, and my run is expected to be finished in
a reasonabl
Arneh,
> How does one build a topology using a different force field (say for
> instance, oplsaa)? Is there a simple way to do it,
I think OpenEye (or someone else, I forget whom) has some sort of
automatic parameterization tool for OPLS that automatically generates
parameters. Of course, th
Dear all,
I am asking a question about pairs and nrexcle. Although I searched the
list, I can not get a clear answer.
According to my understanding, if I set nrexcl =3, 1-4 interactions will
be excluded. But, if I set nrexcl=3 and define some pairs at the same
time, the Gmx will consider which
49 matches
Mail list logo