Re: [gmx-users] About Box size

2012-07-29 Thread Mark Abraham
On 29/07/2012 5:11 PM, vidhya sankar wrote: Dear justin, Thank you for your previous reply. Is there is any Thumb rule in setting rcoulomb , rvdw & rlist ? Yes, use settings that have been proven to work with your forcefield

[gmx-users] Analysis of protein-ligand interactions

2012-07-29 Thread James Starlight
Dear Gromacs Users! I want to analyze protein-ligand polar interactions by means of g_hbond utility In particular I want to obtain some map wich include information aabout dynamics of the h bonds occurence between defined polar groups of the protein ( active site) and ligand polar atoms. For tha

Re: [gmx-users] Diagnosing + system blowing up

2012-07-29 Thread Shima Arasteh
I listened to you absolutely and didn't proceed any other way!  What I created in .rtp file for  FVAL ( like what you described sometime ago), is  as below: First of all added the FVAL to residuetyes.dat. Then added to .rtp file: [ FVAL ]  [ atoms ]     CN    C    0.357    0     ON    O    -0.5

[gmx-users] About EM

2012-07-29 Thread vidhya sankar
Dear gromacs user,     Thank you for your previous reply. i am doing  Energy minimization  using Steepest Descent method . When i do that i got the following error r Steepest Descents converged to machine precision in 35 steps, but did not reach the requested Fmax < 4

Re: [gmx-users] Diagnosing + system blowing up

2012-07-29 Thread Shima Arasteh
 Uh-huh.. :-) ;-) I visualized the .pdb in VMD and it seems OK. All right,  I will do the exercise for tonight. :-) Thanks Mark. Sincerely, Shima - Original Message - From: Mark Abraham To: Discussion list for GROMACS users Cc: Sent: Sunday, July 29, 2012 6:54 AM

Re: [gmx-users] Diagnosing + system blowing up

2012-07-29 Thread Mark Abraham
On 29/07/2012 7:55 PM, Shima Arasteh wrote: I listened to you absolutely and didn't proceed any other way! What I created in .rtp file for FVAL ( like what you described sometime ago), is as below: First of all added the FVAL to residuetyes.dat. Then added to .rtp file: [ FVAL ] [ atoms ]

Re: [gmx-users] About EM

2012-07-29 Thread Mark Abraham
On 29/07/2012 8:08 PM, vidhya sankar wrote: Dear gromacs user, Thank you for your previous reply. i am doing Energy minimization using Steepest Descent method . When i do that i got the following error r Steepest Descents converged to machine precision in 35

Re: [gmx-users] how to build a mixed lipid bilayer?

2012-07-29 Thread Jianguo Li
There are several ways, usually I do like the following: 1. first construct one leaflet. Use "editconf -translate" to construct a small box containing with 3 POPE 1 POPE 2. Use "genconf -nbox" to replicate the above in x,y dimension to get 64 lipids 3. Use "editconf -rotate -translate" to get th

Re: [gmx-users] Diagnosing + system blowing up

2012-07-29 Thread Shima Arasteh
Thanks dear Mark. I don't use ignh. This is the command of pdb2gmx which I enter: pdb2gmx -f monomer.pdb -o monomer.gro -water tip3p -ter grompp does not give me the warning of that the atom names in the topology and the coordinate file don't match, instead it gives me that there are no default

Re: [gmx-users] Analysis of protein-ligand interactions

2012-07-29 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 7/29/12 3:30 AM, James Starlight wrote: Dear Gromacs Users! I want to analyze protein-ligand polar interactions by means of g_hbond utility In particular I want to obtain some map wich include information aabout dynamics of the h bonds occurence between defined polar groups of the protein

Re: [gmx-users] Diagnosing + system blowing up

2012-07-29 Thread Shima Arasteh
grompp warns me for some bonds and dihedrals ( no default ). Ignoring such warnings gives me the same error as before ( some interactions seems to be assigned multiple times) Maybe I didn't modify the .rtp file correctly!   Sincerely, Shima - Original Message - From: Shima Arasteh To:

Re: [gmx-users] Diagnosing + system blowing up

2012-07-29 Thread Mark Abraham
On 29/07/2012 9:31 PM, Shima Arasteh wrote: grompp warns me for some bonds and dihedrals ( no default ). Ignoring such warnings gives me the same error as before ( some interactions seems to be assigned multiple times) Maybe I didn't modify the .rtp file correctly! Shrug... if you won't copy

Re: [gmx-users] Diagnosing + system blowing up

2012-07-29 Thread Shima Arasteh
Pleas don't shrug! Sorry :-( I attach the top file generated by pdb2gmx and this is what I see in terminal: Processing chain 1 (177 atoms, 24 residues) Identified residue FVAL1 as a starting terminus. Identified residue GLY24 as a ending terminus. 8 out of 8 lines of specbond.dat converted succe

Re: [gmx-users] Diagnosing + system blowing up

2012-07-29 Thread Shima Arasteh
Pleas don't shrug! Sorry :-( I attach the top file generated by pdb2gmx and this is what I see in terminal: Processing chain 1 (177 atoms, 24 residues) Identified residue FVAL1 as a starting terminus. Identified residue GLY24 as a ending terminus. 8 out of 8 lines of specbond.dat converted succ

Re: [gmx-users] how to build a mixed lipid bilayer?

2012-07-29 Thread xi zhao
Dear Mr Li Thank you for your help! Can you tell me more detials for the first step, for example, entire command line? thank you! Best regards! --- 12年7月29日,周日, Jianguo Li 写道: > 发件人: Jianguo Li > 主题: Re: [gmx-users] how to build a mixed lipid bilayer? > 收件人: "Discussion list for

Re: [gmx-users] Diagnosing + system blowing up

2012-07-29 Thread Mark Abraham
On 29/07/2012 10:17 PM, Shima Arasteh wrote: Pleas don't shrug! Sorry :-( I attach the top file generated by pdb2gmx and this is what I see in terminal: Processing chain 1 (177 atoms, 24 residues) Identified residue FVAL1 as a starting terminus. Identified residue GLY24 as a ending terminus. 8

Re: [gmx-users] Diagnosing + system blowing up

2012-07-29 Thread Shima Arasteh
So as I got the atomtypes have problem! OK, I will do some exercise with charmm36 and acetyl. Anyway, thanks for all your suggestions. However now my dead is going dizzy :) Sincerely, Shima - Original Message - From: Mark Abraham To: Discussion list for GROMACS users Cc: Sent: Sunday

Re: [gmx-users] Diagnosing + system blowing up

2012-07-29 Thread Shima Arasteh
I did the exercise as you said. A .pdb file of ACE and VAL. I ran the pdb2gmx, entered none as the N-terminus and COO- as the C-terminus. The atomtyps that charmm selects for the acetyl is as below:    1    CT3  1    ACE    CH3  1  -0.27 12.011   ; qtot -0.27 2 HA

[gmx-users] About pdb2gmx

2012-07-29 Thread vidhya sankar
Dear Justin Thank you for your previous reply When i run the .pdb2gmx_d -f 1OG2O.pdb -o 1OG2O.gro  -p 1OG2O.top   -renum It runs successfully. But i have on issue. My PDB contains  HIS residues in both chain A and B I have selected  GROMOS96 53a6 force field (JCC 2004 vol 25 pag 1656) The .rtp f

[gmx-users] RMSD plot

2012-07-29 Thread tarak karmakar
Dear All, In my initial protein pdb structure I have added some external ligand molecules and as a result of that there are several short contacts. So, well, I minimized the system and then got the 'prot_min.gro' file. Now after the equilibration run, I plotted the RMSD of the resulting trajectory

Re: [gmx-users] About pdb2gmx

2012-07-29 Thread tarak karmakar
see its not a big issue. Look at the atom types of the particular RESIDUE in the pdb file and also have a look into the atom types present in the rtp file. Now if these are matching properly then you can choose any convenient name for that particular residue in the rtp file. But the name of the par

Re: [gmx-users] g_sgangle problem

2012-07-29 Thread David van der Spoel
On 2012-07-28 11:28, yousef nademi wrote: hi gromacs users and especially Dr. Justine in using the g_sgangle i have to define index file contain multiple of two defining all the P and N atoms but after executing the g_sgangle i get the message:something wrong with contents of index file after d

Re: [gmx-users] About pdb2gmx

2012-07-29 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 7/29/12 9:39 AM, vidhya sankar wrote: Dear Justin Thank you for your previous reply When i run the .pdb2gmx_d -f 1OG2O.pdb -o 1OG2O.gro -p 1OG2O.top -renum It runs successfully. But i have on issue. My PDB contains HIS residues in both chain A and B I have selected GROMOS96 53a6 force

Re: [gmx-users] About pdb2gmx

2012-07-29 Thread Mark Abraham
On 30/07/2012 8:49 AM, Justin Lemkul wrote: On 7/29/12 9:39 AM, vidhya sankar wrote: Dear Justin Thank you for your previous reply When i run the .pdb2gmx_d -f 1OG2O.pdb -o 1OG2O.gro -p 1OG2O.top -renum It runs successfully. But i have on issue. My PDB contains HIS residues in both chai

Re: [gmx-users] Diagnosing + system blowing up

2012-07-29 Thread Mark Abraham
On 29/07/2012 11:40 PM, Shima Arasteh wrote: I did the exercise as you said. A .pdb file of ACE and VAL. I ran the pdb2gmx, entered none as the N-terminus and COO- as the C-terminus. The atomtyps that charmm selects for the acetyl is as below: 1CT3 1ACECH3 1 -

Re: [gmx-users] RMSD plot

2012-07-29 Thread Mark Abraham
On 30/07/2012 3:39 AM, tarak karmakar wrote: Dear All, In my initial protein pdb structure I have added some external ligand molecules and as a result of that there are several short contacts. So, well, I minimized the system and then got the 'prot_min.gro' file. Now after the equilibration run,

[gmx-users] problems when using trjconv or g_msd to process xtc trajectory files with only a portion of all the atoms in the system

2012-07-29 Thread rocwhite168
Dear Gromacs users, I tried to use "g_msd -s topol.tpr -f traj.xtc -o msd.xvg -trestart 500" to calculate the mean-squared displacements. But the results are clearly erroneous: the first 2500 entries in the output are all "-nan", and after that values stat constant (including zeros). I suspected t

Re: [gmx-users] RMSD plot

2012-07-29 Thread tarak karmakar
Dear Mark, Thanks for the reply. But one thing I am just wondering is that while calculating the RMSD, I'm considering the backbone only. So I can take the initial pdb file as reference for the trajectory. While doing so I see the RMSD graph is continuing to increase and not getting equilibrium v

Re: [gmx-users] RMSD plot

2012-07-29 Thread Mark Abraham
On 30/07/2012 4:49 PM, tarak karmakar wrote: Dear Mark, Thanks for the reply. But one thing I am just wondering is that while calculating the RMSD, I'm considering the backbone only. So I can take the initial pdb file as reference for the trajectory. While doing so I see the RMSD graph is conti