I solved with
genbox -cp conf.gro -cs -maxsol 100 -p topol.top -o out.gro
Thanks!
Anna--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Pleas
Dear all,
I got some question about the implicit solvent.1) In gromacs, is it possible
simulate a protein in a layer of explicit water, and put this system (protein
+ SOL) into a big box and make the MD simulation with implicit solvent? How I
have to set the md.mdp parameter (; IMPLICIT SOLVE
On 4/04/2011 6:11 PM, battis...@libero.it wrote:
Dear all,
I got some question about the implicit solvent.
1) In gromacs, is it possible simulate a protein in a layer of
explicit water, and put this system (protein + SOL) into a big box and
make the MD simulation with implicit solvent?
Dear all
I need to change sigma and epsilon for non-bonded parameters of the OPLSA FF.
In particular I want to set the attractive part of the LJ potential to zero
(C6=0).
In doing this I have read the manual but unfortunately the reported
explanation did not help me. To understand how it works i
On 4/04/2011 6:55 PM, Luca Bellucci wrote:
Dear all
I need to change sigma and epsilon for non-bonded parameters of the OPLSA FF.
In particular I want to set the attractive part of the LJ potential to zero
(C6=0).
In doing this I have read the manual but unfortunately the reported
explanation did
Dear Mark,
about point 2, yes I need to have
a uniform distribution of a defined numberof water molecule (eg. 100 water
molecule ) into my box.
Is it possible with genbox?
After, I'll have to make the md simulation for my
system in implicit solvent
(I'll have "protein + 100 molecule SOL + impl
On 4/04/2011 7:12 PM, battis...@libero.it wrote:
Dear Mark,
about point 2, yes I need to have
a uniform distribution of a defined number
of water molecule (eg. 100 water molecule ) into my box.
Is it possible with genbox?
Yes, but not by starting with a uniform distribution of a
condensed-pha
Dear all,
when I run a single free energy simulation
i noticed that there is a loss of performace with respect to
the normal MD
free_energy= yes
init_lambda= 0.9
delta_lambda = 0.0
couple-moltype = Protein_Chain_P
couple-lambda0 = vdw-q
couple-lambda0 = none
couple-intramol= yes
Thank you very much for your suggestions!
Anna
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the li
Hi Gmx-users,
I set up a Facebook profile where I can post my pictures, videos and events and
I want to add you as a friend so you can see it. First, you need to join
Facebook! Once you join, you can also create your own profile.
Thanks,
Gokul
To sign up for Facebook, follow the link below:
ht
Hi Gmx-users,
I set up a Facebook profile where I can post my pictures, videos and events and
I want to add you as a friend so you can see it. First, you need to join
Facebook! Once you join, you can also create your own profile.
Thanks,
Gokul
To sign up for Facebook, follow the link below:
ht
Hi
I assume that the order of the file names in the tpr-files.dat and
pullx-files.dat is irrelevant for g_wham .
Cheers
Gavin
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Maili
From g_wham -h:
"The tpr and pullx files must be in corresponding order, i.e. the first tpr
created the first pullx, etc."
-Justin
Gavin Melaugh wrote:
Hi
I assume that the order of the file names in the tpr-files.dat and
pullx-files.dat is irrelevant for g_wham .
Cheers
Gavin
--
=
Dear all,
I'm trying to run simulation of 30 proteins in water using the Martini
force field. I used water.gro file in order to solvate the proteins.
For minimization I used the em.mdp file published at Martini site
(http://md.chem.rug.nl/cgmartini/index.php/home). When I set the emtol
par
If we accept your text at face value, then the simulation slowed down
by a factor of 1500%, certainly not the 16% of the load balancing.
Please let us know what version of gromacs and cut and paste your
cammands that you used to run gromacs (so we can verify that you ran
on the same number
What are your initial box dimensions prior to em? Also, please copy
and paste your .mdp options. Also, what happens when you run the same
post-em simulation with nsteps=1 ?
-- original message --
Dear all,
I'm trying to run simulation of 30 proteins in water using the Martini
force field. I
Hi Justin
Yeah I know the tpr files must be in corresponding order with pullx.xvg
files. What I meant was should they be in order of distance. i.e say If
my windows go from 0 to 1.0 nm with windows every 0.1nm, could I list
the files in any order or does it have to like 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4
Gavin
Gavin Melaugh wrote:
Hi Justin
Yeah I know the tpr files must be in corresponding order with pullx.xvg
files. What I meant was should they be in order of distance. i.e say If
my windows go from 0 to 1.0 nm with windows every 0.1nm, could I list
the files in any order or does it have to like 0.
my box dimensions are 368A
Quoting chris.ne...@utoronto.ca:
What are your initial box dimensions prior to em? Also, please copy
and paste your .mdp options. Also, what happens when you run the
same post-em simulation with nsteps=1 ?
-- original message --
Dear all,
I'm trying to run sim
Hi Chris,
thank for the suggestions,
in the previous mail there is a mistake because
couple-moltype = SOL (for solvent) and not "Protein_chaim_P".
Now the problem of the load balance seems reasonable, because
the water box is large ~9.0 nm.
However the problem exist and the performance loss is v
Luca Bellucci wrote:
Hi Chris,
thank for the suggestions,
in the previous mail there is a mistake because
couple-moltype = SOL (for solvent) and not "Protein_chaim_P".
Now the problem of the load balance seems reasonable, because
the water box is large ~9.0 nm.
Now your outcome makes a lo
Load balancing problems I can understand, but why would it take longer
in absolute time? I would have thought that some nodes would simple be
sitting idle, but this should not cause an increase in the overall
simulation time (15x at that!).
There must be some extra communication?
I agree with
Dear Chris and Justin
Thank you for your precious suggestions
This is a test that i perform in a single machine with 8 cores
and gromacs 4.5.4.
I am trying to enhance the sampling of a protein using the decoupling scheme
of the free energy module of gromacs. However when i decouple only the
Dear gmx users,
I used g_mdmat and have got a distance matrices in .xpm format.
Now I want to compare two matrices: for a protein var1 and for protein var2
and create one output file with this compare. How can I do it?
If there is no such function in gromacs, how can I convert .xpm format to
get
Quoting pol...@fh.huji.ac.il:
Dear gromacs users,
my box dimensions are 368A and when I run the simulation with
nsteps=1 it works fine. The mdp files used for minimization and
post-em simulation are attached.
Thanks again for your help.
Regina
Quoting chris.ne...@utoronto.ca:
What are you
Can you please redo the md part with gen_vel=yes and see if that makes
any difference?
Generally, you need to narrow down the problem for us. Does it crash in
serial as well as parallel? How many steps does it go before the crash?
what happens to the system volume as a function of time for the
Luca Bellucci wrote:
Dear Chris and Justin
Thank you for your precious suggestions
This is a test that i perform in a single machine with 8 cores
and gromacs 4.5.4.
I am trying to enhance the sampling of a protein using the decoupling scheme
of the free energy module of gromacs. However
>> Dear Chris and Justin
/ Thank you for your precious suggestions
/>>/ This is a test that i perform in a single machine with 8 cores
/>>/ and gromacs 4.5.4.
/>>/
/>>/ I am trying to enhance the sampling of a protein using the decoupling
scheme
/>>/ of the free energy module of gromacs
Chris Neale wrote:
>> Dear Chris and Justin
/ Thank you for your precious suggestions
/>>/ This is a test that i perform in a single machine with 8 cores
/>>/ and gromacs 4.5.4.
/>>/
/>>/ I am trying to enhance the sampling of a protein using the decoupling scheme
/>>/ of the free ener
Hello all,
I need to calculate the end-to-end vector autocorrelation function of my
polymer chains. I could get the velocity autocorrelation function using
g_velacc tool.
Is there a tool available for calculating end-to-end vector autocorrelation
function? If not, then is there an easy way to m
Dear Colleagues.
I have been searching information about "HOW TO INSTALL GROMACS in rocks
cluster?". Unfortunately, the information that I found is not clear.
Someone can help me with this question. Maybe there are basic but important
steps that I have to keep in mind. Could you please share your
Hello all,
I need to calculate the end-to-end vector autocorrelation function of my
polymer chains. I could get the velocity autocorrelation function using
g_velacc tool.
Is there a tool available for calculating end-to-end vector autocorrelation
function? If not, then is there an easy way to mo
Yes i am testing the possibility to perform an Hamiltonian-REMD
Energy barriers can be overcome increasing the temperature system or scaling
potential energy with a lambda value, these methods are "equivalent".
Both have advantages and disavantages, at this stage it is not the right place
to de
Hi,
I have 2 questions on using g_chi to calculate only one omega angle for X-Pro.
1. I used the following command:
"g_chi -s md.gro/tpr -f md.xtc -omega -o test.xvg" and got the following
message:
Fatal error:
Library file in current dir nor not found aminoacids.datin default directories.
(You
Hi Simon,
Regarding the first question you should set GMXLIB as $GMXDATA/gromacs/top.
I don't know how to solve the second problem bacause I never used g_chi
Il 04/04/2011 22:19, simon sham ha scritto:
Hi,
I have 2 questions on using g_chi to calculate only one omega angle
for X-Pro.
1. I us
simon sham wrote:
Hi,
I have 2 questions on using g_chi to calculate only one omega angle for
X-Pro.
1. I used the following command:
"g_chi -s md.gro/tpr -f md.xtc -omega -o test.xvg" and got the following
message:
Fatal error:
Library file in current dir nor not found aminoacids.datin
Hi all,
A post-doctoral research position is available at Northwestern
University at Evanston, IL.
The position is in the field of computational physical chemistry, with
a focus on molecular dynamics simulation and force field development.
The systems to be studied include water/air, water/ic
Hello,
I want to calculat the coordination number of solute in first solvation
shell.
integration of (4*pi*r^2*g(r)) from 0 to 2.6 A(first solvation shell)
If I calcualte the g_rdf for first solvation shell (till 2.6 A) and then I
integrate this using g_analysis.
Can I go this way.
Nilesh
-
is question. Maybe there are basic but important
> steps that I have to keep in mind. Could you please share yours
> experiences?
>
>
> Thank you in advance.
>
> Miguel Quiliano.
>
> P.D I have installed rocks cluster 5.4
> -- next part --
> An HTML
. Maybe there are basic but
important
steps that I have to keep in mind. Could you please share yours
experiences?
Thank you in advance.
Miguel Quiliano.
P.D I have installed rocks cluster 5.4
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed..
I'll rather use: g_rdf -cn
Marcelo.
On Apr 4, 2011, at 4:17 PM, Nilesh Dhumal wrote:
Hello,
I want to calculat the coordination number of solute in first
solvation
shell.
integration of (4*pi*r^2*g(r)) from 0 to 2.6 A(first solvation shell)
If I calcualte the g_rdf for first solvation sh
Justin,
Thank you for your comments after finishing the MD production run for up
to 20 ns...
Since this step was over very quickly, now I have a simple question
¿How long, in human time, should a production run last?
The production run was carried out in six processors Intel Xeon (R)
E540
Dr. Ramón Garduño-Juárez wrote:
Justin,
Thank you for your comments after finishing the MD production run for up
to 20 ns...
Since this step was over very quickly, now I have a simple question
¿How long, in human time, should a production run last?
There is no way to answer that. It
Hi,
Thanks for those who replied my previous questions on g_chi.
I just installed the latest version of gromacs 4.5.4 and could run the command.
I still have
a question about the command:
Again, I used the following command:
"g_chi -s md.tpr -f md.xtc -omega"
It generated a series of xmgrace file
Justin,
Again much obliged for your comments. They are most illustrative...
I would like to make a final note on the issue of these many e-mails...
I am sure that GROMACS is fast, but that fast?...
For the sake of knowing that we are doing the right things, this is our
topol.top file in which
Dr. Ramón Garduño-Juárez wrote:
Justin,
Again much obliged for your comments. They are most illustrative...
I would like to make a final note on the issue of these many e-mails...
I am sure that GROMACS is fast, but that fast?...
Yes. Your results prove it. With quality hardware, you ge
simon sham wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for those who replied my previous questions on g_chi.
I just installed the latest version of gromacs 4.5.4 and could run the
command. I still have
a question about the command:
Again, I used the following command:
"g_chi -s md.tpr -f md.xtc -omega"
It generated a
On 5/04/2011 2:55 AM, shivangi nangia wrote:
Hello all,
I need to calculate the end-to-end vector autocorrelation function of
my polymer chains. I could get the velocity autocorrelation function
using g_velacc tool.
Is there a tool available for calculating end-to-end vector
autocorrelati
Dear users,
I am new to Gromacs.
I am trying to study thermal unfolding of a protein having intra molecular
disulfide bonds.
As during simulations these bonds will not break, will I be able to study
the unfolding pathway.
Are there other ways to study such type of systems.
S Satya
Gulbraga Univers
Dear Tsjerk,
Hi Ahmet,
>
> As suggested, it's better to break up your molecule into smaller
> charge groups. Note that charge groups don't need to have zero charge,
> nor integer charge. In your case, I'd suggest two COH groups for EDO,
> which will have zero net charge each, and for TRS I'd take
On 5/04/2011 3:57 PM, ahmet yıldırım wrote:
Dear Tsjerk,
Hi Ahmet,
As suggested, it's better to break up your molecule into smaller
charge groups. Note that charge groups don't need to have zero charge,
nor integer charge. In your case, I'd suggest two COH groups for EDO,
wh
hello friends,
I am doing simulation of ganglioside gm2 and am getting the following error.
Fatal error:
Syntax error - File gm2gang.top, line 6
Last line read:
'[ atomtypes ] '
Invalid order for directive atomtypes
Can anyone please help me in this.I am new to gromacs.
--
*Geethu Issac*
*
"A
52 matches
Mail list logo