Hi Zuzana,
what version are you running? I had the same problem.
After couple of sleepless nights found in archives that there was a bug in
version 3.3.2:-)
When I followed the advice given there
This is a known bug, recently introduced, but fixed again in CVS. You can edit
the source code
Hi Peggy,
I suspect that in your .mdp file you have a line
xtc-grps = Protein
This means that the xtc file will only contain those atoms which
gromacs reckognizes as amino acids, based on the list in the file
aminoacids.dat. Your .tpr file which is used to base the index on,
contains all atoms,
Thank you for your reply, Tsjerk!
I used gmxcheck, and got exactly the same number of atoms in xtc file as
#proteinAtoms+#calciumAtoms+#chlorideAtom.
I also checked my mdp file. It does have "xtc_grps = protein Ca Cl".
In previous similar runs, I successfully wrote these atoms out. The only
diff
Hi Peggy,
The key thing is that there's a mismatch between your .tpr file and
your .xtc file. The first is used for the indexing and it may very
well be that there's stuff in between the protein and the calcium.
That way, the index number for Ca, which should be N(protein) + 1, is
actually N(prote
Thank you for the explanation!
In fact, 2 Ca atoms are a part of the protein. They are in the PDB file
passed to pdb2gmx. Water molecules are added after the protein atoms and the
Ca atoms, as in the PDB file after genbox. So I suppose, in the .tpr file,
atoms should be ordered as protein-Ca-water
Hi all,
I want to calculate the water number in the hydration shell around the
solute, but I am not clear about the way to do it with the tools in gmx.I hope
someone will gieve a hand?Thank you in advance!
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-user
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I want to calculate the water number in the hydration shell around the
solute, but I am not clear about the way to do it with the tools in gmx.I hope
someone will gieve a hand?Thank you in advance!
g_rdf.
_
Hello, How can I install Gromacs on Window XP?
Thanks a lot!
Hero
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
___
gmx-users mailing listgm
Hi Markus,
Thanks for the reply. It worked fine.
Jes
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (u
Hero wrote:
Hello, How can I install Gromacs on Window XP?
See http://wiki.gromacs.org/index.php/Installation and links thereon.
Mark
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search
Hi GMX users,
Can GROMACS simulate the bond forming and breaking?
Thanks.
Best,
Super
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/
Dear list,
Since the unit is not printed in the .xvg file
generated by the module g_msd in GROMACS 3.3.2 version , I would like to know
the unit of diffusion coefficient calculated. Is it in cm^2/ sec or m^2/sec?
regards,
jes
__
JMandumpal wrote:
Dear list,
Since the unit is not printed in the .xvg file
generated by the module g_msd in GROMACS 3.3.2 version , I would like to
know the unit of diffusion coefficient calculated. Is it in cm^2/ sec or
m^2/sec?
I'm pretty sure it is printed, but
Wei, Xiupeng wrote:
Hi GMX users,
Can GROMACS simulate the bond forming and breaking?
Technically, yes.
However if you need to ask that question, then it's highly likely that
attempting such a simulation will require you to do a great deal of
background reading and simulation practici
14 matches
Mail list logo