On 3/20/2007 10:03 PM, toma0052 wrote:
Hello,
I am performing a simulation in parallel on four processors. The
simulation seems to run fine, and outputs a shuffled *.gro file. I would
like to change the order of atoms to what they were in the original input
*.gro file, but I am having some
Dear gmx-users,
I am a new one...
coming to the point...I am simulating in parallel different
configurations and settings of a protein
around 300 residues large plus approximately 12000 water molecules.
I am simulating NPT with berendsen for P and T to equilibrate over 100
ps and then the simu
Note: forwarded message attached.
-
Finding fabulous fares is fun.
Let Yahoo! FareChase search your favorite travel sites to find flight and hotel
bargains.--- Begin Message ---
Although I could run sucessfully speptide tutorial,while attempting the
drug-enzyme
Hi Loris,
Enjoying the nice weather here, I'll just give a gentle reiteration of
previous remarks. What you observe is caused by the fact that you only
have a very small system from which you try to extract a macroscopic
property (i.e. defined only for large systems). The large fluctuations
are n
Note: forwarded message attached.
-
Bored stiff? Loosen up...
Download and play hundreds of games for free on Yahoo! Games.--- Begin Message ---
Hi!
I'm trying to do a simulation of a protein with bound sulfite ion (Tyr
(SO3H)).After the first command ( pd
Hi Fulya,
Did grompp give you any warnings? At what time did the error occur? At
the start of the simulation or later? Could you check the log file for
LINCS warnings, and try to track down the first occurrence? This would
help to be able to say some more than "your system is exploding".
Best,
Hi Fulya,
You can't just simulate everything you set your mind on. There are no
parameters for sulfite bound tyrosine in the database (just what it
says). You have to add them yourself, which I don't recommend at this
point, since it is clear you have but little experience in this field
(and para
Hi Tsjerk,
Thanks for your prompt reply.
I was asking about the average value of the property.
I understood that large fluctuations are reasonable, but I was expecting
that the mean value
over 15 ns could be somehow as the set in the parameter file as happens
with Berendsen pressure coupling.
HI EVERYBODY,
I HAVE A PROBLEM WITH gen_vel.IF I MAKE AN ANALYZE WITH POSITION RESTRAINT I
USED gen_vel=yes.AFTER FOR FULL MDP I USED gen_vel=no.AFTER THAT I USED
gen_vel=no FOR AGAIN FULL.MDP.BUT I GOT VERY BAD RMSD GRAPHICS.ANY HELP ABOUT
WHAT IS THE MEANING OF gen_vel=no,gen-vel=yes?
Hi Lorix,
Sorry for that. You used the word "maintained" from which I inferred
you were referring to the fluctuations (biased by the occurrence of
the question obviously). Under normal conditions the equilibration
shouldn't take that long. How far off is the mean? Do you still
observe a trend? St
Hi Tsjerk,
Many thanks for your suggestions.After "grompp -f em.mdp -c trp_b4em.pdb -p
trp.top -o trp_em.tpr " comand there was no warning message.Then I did mdrun (
mdrun -s trp_em.tpr -o trp_em.trr -c trp_b4pr.pdb -g em.log -e em.edr ) and it
was finished but
it gave warning message(Warni
GENERATE VELOCITIES FROM A maxwell DISTRIBUTION FOR ALL ATOMS OR NOT
(keep from file or 0.0). SEE CHAPTER 7 OF THE gromacs MANUAL.
YOUR WELCOME
Tsjerk
On 3/27/07, özge kül <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
HI EVERYBODY,
I HAVE A PROBLEM WITH gen_vel.IF I MAKE AN ANALYZE WITH POSITION RESTRAINT I
USE
Dear gmx-users,
I would like to analyze CHARMM trajectories in GROMACS, and wonder if
there are available scripts or tools to convert CHARMM traj to GROMACS
traj (.xtc). I've searched the contributed software and forum
sections, and it looks like there is a script for that, but couldn't
find
according to what you have described, it is correct. is your reference
structure wrong for RMSD calculation?
On 3/27/2007 8:56 PM, özge kül wrote:
HI EVERYBODY,
I HAVE A PROBLEM WITH gen_vel.IF I MAKE AN ANALYZE WITH POSITION
RESTRAINT I USED gen_vel=yes.AFTER FOR FULL MDP I USED
gen_vel=no
Hi Joys Yu,
In addition to Tserks comments you might want to use a more specifically
developed heavy water model.
Here is a reference you may find usefull:
An effective pair potential for heavy water - J. Raul Grigera
The Journal of Chemical Physics -- May 8, 2001 -- Volume 114, Issue 18, pp.
8
Hi,
I am not an expert about heavy water -- but it does seem strange to me
to think that you could get "heavy water" just by changing the mass of
the hydrogens in a conventional water model. The *only* thing this
will affect is the kinetic energy and mass of water. Presumably
changing hydrogen to
Hi Tsjerk,
I set the pressure in the parameter file to be 1bar and I get different
average values ranging from 0.4 to 1.7 bar. Maybe they are not significantly
different (?) but I try to simulate large conformational changes and
according to
what I saw small difference in settings can make diff
Hi Loris,
You're always stuck with limitations of simulations one way or the
other. Now, berendsen barostat is disputed in some sense, but it does
a good job usually (and it is so simple). The question would be, how
far off is it from THE thermodynamic ensemble of your system (and how
far off are
? wrote:
HI EVERYBODY,
I HAVE A PROBLEM WITH gen_vel.IF I MAKE AN ANALYZE WITH POSITION
RESTRAINT I USED gen_vel=yes.AFTER FOR FULL MDP I USED gen_vel=no.AFTER
THAT I USED gen_vel=no FOR AGAIN FULL.MDP.BUT I GOT VERY BAD RMSD
GRAPHICS.ANY HELP ABOUT WHAT IS THE MEANING OF gen_vel=no,gen-vel=
All,
I'm trying to figure out how to use tabulated nonbonded interactions
in GROMACS in conjunction with free energy calculations. While the
documentation addresses both separately, I am somewhat confused about
what would happen if I try to use both simultaneously. In particular,
I'm looking at t
Hwankyu Lee wrote:
Dear gmx-users,
I would like to analyze CHARMM trajectories in GROMACS, and wonder if
there are available scripts or tools to convert CHARMM traj to GROMACS
traj (.xtc). I've searched the contributed software and forum sections,
and it looks like there is a script for that
Hi,
Actually, I believe that only one force field (ffgmx) currently has an
n2t file, at least as recently as 3.3.1. I would try running a find or
locate command to see if you even have the n2t files to begin with. I also
believe I read earlier on the mailing list that the CVS branch has some
im
Hi, i've solved my problem concerning dihedral restraints, hope that
it'll be usefull for those who have trouvble using it.
The constraints must have values between 0 and 360° !
Not that complicated, but it took me 2 weeks to figure that out...
___
gmx-
Hi,
Thanks for the response. Sorry that the statement of my problem was so
cumbersome. My problem was with the noncontinuous numbering of molecules
following deshuffling using editconf. What I am doing, is following an md
run, performing a simple transformation of the coordinates in the res
Hi
Please can someone help me with g_sdf
I would like to calculate the sdfs of two different types of lipid
headgroups around another species in my system.
Specifically I have 119 lipids of one type and 116 of the other- do I need
to normalise to account for this difference? If so, any advice as
Dear all,
Thank you so much for your suggestions. You don't know
how much you guys are helpful.
First with Tsjerk's suggestion of using gmxdump, I got
to know where the problem is. What I changed is
ffgmx.atp and spc.itp. It is useful to pdb2gmx. But
for grompp, it is not enough. I have to change
> Please can someone help me with g_sdf
> I would like to calculate the sdfs of two different types of
> lipid headgroups around another species in my system.
>
> Specifically I have 119 lipids of one type and 116 of the
> other- do I need to normalise to account for this difference?
> If so, a
Hi,
I would like to run NVE Simulation and so I turn off the Temperature
coupling (Nose-Hoover or Beredsen).
Yet I guess the Langevin thermostat coupling is still on (From the manual,
in .mdp file, for Langevin Dynamics, if bd_fric is set to be zero, the
friction coefficient for each particle is
toma0052 wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for the response. Sorry that the statement of my problem was so
cumbersome. My problem was with the noncontinuous numbering of molecules
following deshuffling using editconf. What I am doing, is following an md
run, performing a simple transformation of the coor
Hi,
I added CNT residue in the ffgmx.rtp as follows:
" [ CNT ]
[ atoms ]
C C0.00 0"
Then I used x2top to gene
Hi,
I am using Tubegen to generate carbon nanotubes for my simulations.
Is there any better method to do this?
Thank you very much,
George
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Hi Tsjerk,
Do you know how can I add parameters for sulfite bound?You are right I
have little experience in this field but maybe one of my friends can do this.I
would be very grateful if you can explain parameterization briefly.
And I dont think there is a problem with the mail s
fulya caglar wrote:
Hi Tsjerk,
Do you know how can I add parameters for sulfite bound?You are right
I have little experience in this field but maybe one of my friends can
do this.I would be very grateful if you can explain parameterization
briefly.
It's an involved process, which va
2007/3/26, syma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi,
I am attempting to calculate the rdfs of the various components of my
system
wrt to DNA phosphate groups. However, I was wondering how I can normalise
so
I can compare the various rdfs? Ideally I would like to have the g(r)
normalised in the range 0-1.
34 matches
Mail list logo