Re: [gmx-users] MG-ATP

2011-04-29 Thread Justin A. Lemkul
Sajad Ahrari wrote: thanks felix you are right.both exist.but how can i tell gromacs to put MG ions in the standard vicinity of ATP? or maybe gromacs knows it already and i have to just type "MG-ATP" instead of "ADP"? If all residues, including ligands and cofactors, exist in the .rtp dat

Re: [gmx-users] MG-ATP

2011-04-29 Thread Sajad Ahrari
thanks felix you are right.both exist.but how can i tell gromacs to put MG ions in the standard vicinity of ATP? or maybe gromacs knows it already and i have to just type "MG-ATP" instead of "ADP"? From: "Rausch, Felix" To: Discussion list for GROMACS users

Re: [gmx-users] MG-ATP

2011-04-27 Thread Mark Abraham
On 4/27/2011 6:52 PM, Sajad Ahrari wrote: dear users is "MG-ATP" known to gromacs ? in my pdb structure I have ADP and MG, apart from each other and not being crystallized in the right place. can i omit them and replace ADP's with MG-ATP? or I should introduce this topology to gromacs? You'l