Re: [gmx-users] LJ potential

2010-10-02 Thread Amir Marcovitz
Be careful if you are going to change the parameter to zero , because there is a combination rule that defines the usage of C6 and C12. and this combination rule is defined in the *.itp file On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 8:34 PM, wrote: > How can I do that using OPLSAA, because in the nb.itp file the

Re: [gmx-users] LJ potential

2010-09-27 Thread nishap . patel
How can I do that using OPLSAA, because in the nb.itp file the values are for sigma/epsilon? Can I change C6=0 in the code file? Quoting David van der Spoel : On 2010-09-27 18.37, nishap.pa...@utoronto.ca wrote: Hello, Is there a way to turn off the 6-term in LJ 6-12 potential? -Nisha P.

Re: [gmx-users] LJ potential

2010-09-27 Thread David van der Spoel
On 2010-09-27 18.37, nishap.pa...@utoronto.ca wrote: Hello, Is there a way to turn off the 6-term in LJ 6-12 potential? -Nisha P. Set the parameters to zero? -- David van der Spoel, Ph.D., Professor of Biology Dept. of Cell & Molec. Biol., Uppsala University. Box 596, 75124 Uppsala, Sweden.

Re: [gmx-users] LJ potential

2010-09-01 Thread Sai Pooja
Questions inline... On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 7:25 PM, Mark Abraham wrote: > > > - Original Message - > From: Sai Pooja > Date: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 2:45 > Subject: Re: [gmx-users] LJ potential > To: Discussion list for GROMACS users > > > > > Tha

Re: [gmx-users] LJ potential

2010-08-30 Thread Mark Abraham
- Original Message - From: Sai Pooja Date: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 2:45 Subject: Re: [gmx-users] LJ potential To: Discussion list for GROMACS users > > Thanks Mark. I have just 2 more queries regarding this. > > When using > tables for the potential, &

Re: [gmx-users] LJ potential

2010-08-30 Thread Sai Pooja
:54 PM, Mark Abraham wrote: > > > - Original Message - > From: Sai Pooja > Date: Monday, August 30, 2010 3:33 > Subject: Re: [gmx-users] LJ potential > To: Discussion list for GROMACS users > > > Hi, > > > > > I am simulating a system of a prot

Re: [gmx-users] LJ potential

2010-08-29 Thread Mark Abraham
- Original Message - From: Sai Pooja Date: Monday, August 30, 2010 3:33 Subject: Re: [gmx-users] LJ potential To: Discussion list for GROMACS users > Hi, > > I am simulating a system of a protein in water. I am trying to run the > simulation with a modified protein-

Re: [gmx-users] LJ potential

2010-08-29 Thread Sai Pooja
Hi, I am simulating a system of a protein in water. I am trying to run the simulation with a modified protein-water LJ and coulomb interaction. Since LJ and coulomb interaction parameters are defined at the atomic level in the forcefield files, I cannot figure out a good way to modify them for pr

Re: [gmx-users] LJ potential

2010-08-24 Thread Florian Dommert
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 08/24/2010 02:27 PM, Sai Pooja wrote: > Hi, > > If there are n types of atoms in protein, how does one specify: > 1) Different types of LJ non-bonded interactions for different pairs? > 2) Modified Coloumb(by a pre-multiplier) interactions for diff