Dear Sir,
Thank you Sir for the clarification.
Need to explore about this.
Thanking you
With Regards
M. Kavyashree
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Tsjerk Wassenaar wrote:
> Hi Kavya,
>
> > Thanks sir. I will go through them. However I have referred -
> > "A Tutorial on Principle component
Hi Kavya,
> Thanks sir. I will go through them. However I have referred -
> "A Tutorial on Principle component Analysis" by Lindsay I Smith.
> Which gave a good understanding about the concepts. Still I
> have some doubts regarding eigen values, as you have told
> I will think over them again.
I
Dear Sir,
Thanks sir. I will go through them. However I have referred -
"A Tutorial on Principle component Analysis" by Lindsay I Smith.
Which gave a good understanding about the concepts. Still I
have some doubts regarding eigen values, as you have told
I will think over them again.
But one sta
Hi Kavya,
> Its g_covar contributed by Dr. Rossen apostolov if I am right. Here it
> states that those which are having correlation coefficient better than 0.5
> will be reported, so covariance gives those which have correlation
> coefficient
> less than 0.5?
I don't know the modified version. B
Dear Sir,
Thanks for giving a clearer picture about essential dynamics. I was very
eagerly awaiting for a reply. Thanks you very much :).
No, ED does not make any assumptions on the nature of motions. It does
> not distinguish anharmonic from harmonic motions. It also does not
> distinguish
Hi Kavya,
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 8:18 AM, Kavyashree M wrote:
> Dear Gromacs users,
>
> I am new to essential dynamics, I have gone through
> some fundamentals in PCS, the mailing list related to ED
> and few publications by -
> Amadei (Proteins, 17, 412-425, 1993),
> a. Amadei (journal of biomo
6 matches
Mail list logo
