Re: [gmx-users] Eigenvalue values from PCA (a general question)

Thanks Tsjerk On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 4:55 PM, Tsjerk Wassenaar wrote: > Hi Vijayan.R, > > Not really. NMA also assumes linear relationships. > > Cheers, > > Tsjerk > > On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 10:48 PM, R.S.K.Vijayan > wrote: > > Hi Tsjerk > > > > Many thanks for your response. Do you think NMA

Re: [gmx-users] Eigenvalue values from PCA (a general question)

Hi Vijayan.R, Not really. NMA also assumes linear relationships. Cheers, Tsjerk On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 10:48 PM, R.S.K.Vijayan wrote: > Hi Tsjerk > > Many thanks for your response. Do you think NMA is worth considering in such > cases like this? > > Regards > Vijayan.R > > On Thu, Dec 15,

Re: [gmx-users] Eigenvalue values from PCA (a general question)

Hi Tsjerk Many thanks for your response. Do you think NMA is worth considering in such cases like this? Regards Vijayan.R On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 3:39 PM, Tsjerk Wassenaar wrote: > Hi Vijayan R., > > > What i infer from this is that the cumulative variance experienced by > the > > top 10 P

Re: [gmx-users] Eigenvalue values from PCA (a general question)

Hi Vijayan R., > What i infer from this is that the cumulative variance experienced by  the > top 10 PC is  hardly ~ 30 %. Not experienced...; It's the variance captured by the first ten PC's. > a) does this imply inadequate sampling by MD or a limited conformational > change happening  in the s