Re: [gmx-users] Distance restraints exploding system

2013-09-05 Thread Trayder Thomas
To wrap this up for anyone who stumbles across this in the future: The 'solution' I ended up going with was to avoid using hydrogen atoms in the restraints, instead restraining to the e.g. methyl carbon and adding a fudge factor to the restraint length to account for the C-H distance. This results

Re: [gmx-users] Distance restraints exploding system

2013-09-02 Thread Rafael I. Silverman y de la Vega
Have you tried with even less restraints? I found systems are not always stable with more than the bare minimum of restraints On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 7:54 PM, Trayder Thomas wrote: > It still explodes on a 0.1fs timestep, turning off P-R doesn't seem to have > an impact. I've tried being gentle,

Re: [gmx-users] Distance restraints exploding system

2013-09-01 Thread Trayder Thomas
It still explodes on a 0.1fs timestep, turning off P-R doesn't seem to have an impact. I've tried being gentle, slowly turning up the force constant and running for 1 ns for each value but as soon as the force constant approaches 100 it crashes. The starting structure was generated with the same re

Re: [gmx-users] Distance restraints exploding system

2013-08-30 Thread Mark Abraham
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 8:56 AM, Trayder wrote: > Hello, > I am attempting to simulate a protein-ligand complex using distance > restraints to match it to NMR data. > The system runs stably without restraints. With restraints it tends to spit > out LINCS angle warnings and blow up under most condi