Hello,
Yes i did that. but qualitatively i did not see any such clashes.
But i do not know how to quantify it by calculations.
Thank you
with regards
Kavya
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 5:51 PM, Sarath Chandra Dantu wrote:
>
> > Hello again,
> >
> > I centered it and then did the calculation again for
> Hello again,
>
> I centered it and then did the calculation again for minimum image
> distance
> but still it showed the same graph as without centering. I tried
> visualising
> it
> using vmd but could not see any such clashes. since I am new to vmd
> I do not know whether it is possible to cal
On 26/09/2011 10:02 PM, Kavyashree M wrote:
Hello again,
I centered it and then did the calculation again for minimum image
distance
but still it showed the same graph as without centering.
Have you followed the kind of workflow suggested here?
http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/Terminolo
Hello again,
I centered it and then did the calculation again for minimum image distance
but still it showed the same graph as without centering. I tried visualising
it
using vmd but could not see any such clashes. since I am new to vmd
I do not know whether it is possible to calculate such clashe
Thanks.
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Justin A. Lemkul wrote:
>
>
> Kavyashree M wrote:
>
>> Dear users,
>>
>> I was trying to simulate a protein dimer covalently bond with
>> a disulphide bond (230+230 aa long). I used usual protocol
>> as used for simulation of a monomeric protein, using gr
Kavyashree M wrote:
Dear users,
I was trying to simulate a protein dimer covalently bond with
a disulphide bond (230+230 aa long). I used usual protocol
as used for simulation of a monomeric protein, using gromacs-
4.5.3, dodecahedron box, tip4p water model and protein to
box distance of 1 (-d
6 matches
Mail list logo