Re: [gmx-users] Concatenating two trajectories

Thanks Sir, I understood... On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 16:46, Justin A. Lemkul wrote: > > > bipin singh wrote: >> >> Yes It is workingbut I have not tried that, what would be the >> difference if I don't give -cat option >> > > If the times are the same, then the second trajectory would

Re: [gmx-users] Concatenating two trajectories

bipin singh wrote: Yes It is workingbut I have not tried that, what would be the difference if I don't give -cat option If the times are the same, then the second trajectory would have overwritten the first. Please read the first paragraph of trjcat -h. -Justin On Wed, Jul

Re: [gmx-users] Concatenating two trajectories

Yes It is workingbut I have not tried that, what would be the difference if I don't give -cat option On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 16:16, Justin A. Lemkul wrote: > > > bipin singh wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> I want concatenate two trajectories which have same number of frames >> and they have

Re: [gmx-users] Concatenating two trajectories

bipin singh wrote: Hello, I want concatenate two trajectories which have same number of frames and they have written for identical time period i.e. the simulation time is same for both the trajectories(for my case 100ns each) the only thing differ is the temperature of simulation. Please sugge