Re: [gmx-users] Charmm to Gromacs: Polyols force field [Justin]

2010-08-23 Thread Bruce D. Ray
On Mon, August 23, 2010 12:12 PM, Eudes Fileti wrote: > Well, the line 40 is just one of the 36 parameters not found! > In this link ( https://sites.google.com/site/fileti/ ) I put > the complete files. > I know I need to determine which bond type should be called > and I believe that it has bee

Re: Re: [gmx-users] Charmm to Gromacs: Polyols force field [Justin]

2010-08-23 Thread Mark Abraham
- Original Message - From: Eudes Fileti Date: Tuesday, August 24, 2010 2:12 Subject: Re: Re: [gmx-users] Charmm to Gromacs: Polyols force field [Justin] To: gmx-users@gromacs.org > Hello Justin, thanks again.> Well, the line 40 is just one of the 36 > parameters not found!

Re: Re: [gmx-users] Charmm to Gromacs: Polyols force field [Justin]

2010-08-23 Thread Eudes Fileti
Hello Justin, thanks again. Well, the line 40 is just one of the 36 parameters not found! In this link ( https://sites.google.com/site/fileti/ ) I put the complete files. I know I need to determine which bond type should be called and I believe that it has been done, but I don't know why it's not b

Re: [gmx-users] Charmm to Gromacs: Polyols force field [Justin]

2010-08-23 Thread Eudes Fileti
Hello Justin, thank you for answering! I think I already have done what you suggested when I created my ffbonded.itp and .rtp files. I am sending a piece of my topology and ffbonded.itp files. Follows also the residue from .rtp and the configuration of glycol (.gro) so you can consider where I mi

Re: [gmx-users] Charmm to Gromacs: Polyols force field [Justin]

2010-08-23 Thread Justin A. Lemkul
Eudes Fileti wrote: Hello Justin, thank you for answering! I think I already have done what you suggested when I created my ffbonded.itp and .rtp files. I am sending a piece of my topology and ffbonded.itp files. Follows also the residue from .rtp and the configuration of glycol (.gro) so yo