Re: [gmx-users] All-bonds vs. H-bonds using CHARMM36

2013-10-31 Thread rajat desikan
Thank you, Justin! I did intend to use h-bonds for the CHARMM36 simulations and all-bonds elsewhere (depending on the FF). I just wanted some clarity before I proceeded. On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 1:49 AM, Justin Lemkul wrote: > > > On 10/31/13 2:21 PM, rajat desikan wrote: > >> Hi, >> In the CHARM

Re: [gmx-users] All-bonds vs. H-bonds using CHARMM36

2013-10-31 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 10/31/13 2:21 PM, rajat desikan wrote: Hi, In the CHARMM36 paper (Klauda et al., JPCB 2010), only the hydrogen bonds are constrained for the lipid simulations using SHAKE (excerpt from the paper below) "Consistent for all of these simulations was the use of a 1 fs time step and constraining