Re: [gmx-users] .n2t file for the CHARMM forcefield

2012-10-11 Thread Justin Lemkul
2012 23:13:34 -0400 From: jalem...@vt.edu To: gmx-users@gromacs.org Subject: Re: [gmx-users] .n2t file for the CHARMM forcefield On 10/10/12 11:11 PM, Elie M wrote: Ok. This means that I have to form the .n2t file for the CHARMM field as it is required by x2top. For the OPLSAA field the format

RE: [gmx-users] .n2t file for the CHARMM forcefield

2012-10-10 Thread Elie M
ct: Re: [gmx-users] .n2t file for the CHARMM forcefield > > > > On 10/10/12 11:11 PM, Elie M wrote: > > > > Ok. This means that I have to form the .n2t file for the CHARMM field as it > > is required by x2top. For the OPLSAA field the format was: > > "C

Re: [gmx-users] .n2t file for the CHARMM forcefield

2012-10-10 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 10/10/12 11:11 PM, Elie M wrote: Ok. This means that I have to form the .n2t file for the CHARMM field as it is required by x2top. For the OPLSAA field the format was: "Copls_1570.00012.011 4H 0.108 H 0.108 H 0.108 C 0.150C opls_1580.000 12.0114H

RE: [gmx-users] .n2t file for the CHARMM forcefield

2012-10-10 Thread Elie M
0.150" How does this become in CHARMM? Shall we keep the atom names and change the oplsaa into atom types like CE1, CD,.and keep the rest fixed? Elie > Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 22:37:58 -0400 > From: jalem...@vt.edu > To: gmx-users@gromacs.org > Subject: Re: [gmx-us

Re: [gmx-users] .n2t file for the CHARMM forcefield

2012-10-10 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 10/10/12 10:35 PM, Elie M wrote: Dear all, Is the form of the .n2t file (read by x2top to produce the top file) the same for all forcefields? I am using the CHARMM forcefield but I could not find an ffcharmm27.n2t file. The .n2t format is universal. Most force fields do not have .n2t f