Re: [gmx-users] soft-core potential in combination with PME (sorry, again)

2007-04-24 Thread Maik Goette
David Mobley wrote: > If I remember correctly, basically what the Anwar paper tries to > achieve is separately smoothing the two. You could probably accomplish > the same thing by allowing separate sc-alpha and sc-power for Coulomb > and LJ interactions so they can be tuned separately. I would s

Re: [gmx-users] soft-core potential in combination with PME

2007-04-19 Thread David Mobley
e meantime I can fix errors in the existing one or clarify. David Greetings, Jeroen > Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 09:18:21 -0700 > From: "David Mobley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [gmx-users] soft-core potential in combination with PME > (sorry, agai

Re: [gmx-users] soft-core potential in combination with PME

2007-04-17 Thread Jeroen van Bemmelen
energy tutorial, or do you consider that project finished? I used it as a starting point for my simulations and may have some interesting remarks and/or suggestions. Greetings, Jeroen > Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 09:18:21 -0700 > From: "David Mobley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: [gmx-users] soft-core potential in combination with PME (sorry, again)

2007-04-13 Thread Berk Hess
From: "David Mobley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: Discussion list for GROMACS users <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Discussion list for GROMACS users" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [gmx-users] soft-core potential in combination with PME (sorry,again) Date:

Re: [gmx-users] soft-core potential in combination with PME (sorry, again)

2007-04-13 Thread David Mobley
t works much better. David Berk. >From: "Jeroen van Bemmelen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: Discussion list for GROMACS users <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: [gmx-users] soft-core potential in combination with PME >(sorry,again) >Dat

RE: [gmx-users] soft-core potential in combination with PME

2007-04-12 Thread Jeroen van Bemmelen
Thanks a lot, Berk. This is exactly the answer I was hoping for, meaning it's clear for me now. Jeroen > Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 13:42:42 +0200 > From: "Berk Hess" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: [gmx-users] soft-core potential in combination with PME >

RE: [gmx-users] soft-core potential in combination with PME (sorry, again)

2007-04-12 Thread Berk Hess
IL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: Discussion list for GROMACS users <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [gmx-users] soft-core potential in combination with PME (sorry,again) Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 12:38:56 +0200 Hi Berk (and others), Thanks a lot for your quick answer. And sor

RE: [gmx-users] soft-core potential in combination with PME (sorry, again)

2007-04-12 Thread Jeroen van Bemmelen
Hi Berk (and others), Thanks a lot for your quick answer. And sorry to bother you again with this long email, but I still feel I'm missing something really essential here. I agree that in essence the convergence and the singularity are two different problems. And if I understand you correctly,

RE: [gmx-users] soft-core potential in combination with PME (sorry, again)

2007-04-12 Thread Berk Hess
Soft-core interactions are fully supported with PME. Both mails you quote do not state otherwise. The second mail refers to convergence issues when switching off LJ as well as electrostatics interactions. This problem will (probably) always be present, and has nothing to do with the singularities