RE: [gmx-users] kappa in Generalized reaction field

From: Tomoshi Kameda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: Discussion list for GROMACS users To: gmx-users@gromacs.org Subject: [gmx-users] kappa in Generalized reaction field Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 14:35:31 +0900 > > > >Do we want to keep this code at all? > > Good question. > I think simulating io

Re: [gmx-users] kappa in Generalized reaction field

From: David van der Spoel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: Discussion list for GROMACS users To: Discussion list for GROMACS users Subject: Re: [gmx-users] kappa in Generalized reaction field Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 11:52:12 +0200 Berk Hess wrote: From: Tomoshi Kameda <[EMAIL

Re: [gmx-users] kappa in Generalized reaction field

Berk Hess wrote: From: Tomoshi Kameda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: Discussion list for GROMACS users To: gmx-users@gromacs.org Subject: [gmx-users] kappa in Generalized reaction field Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 17:28:27 +0900 Hi all I'm going to ask about the definition of kappa in Generalize

RE: [gmx-users] kappa in Generalized reaction field

From: Tomoshi Kameda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: Discussion list for GROMACS users To: gmx-users@gromacs.org Subject: [gmx-users] kappa in Generalized reaction field Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 17:28:27 +0900 Hi all I'm going to ask about the definition of kappa in Generalized Reaction-field.