RE: [gmx-users] Re: boundaries in PMF

2012-05-31 Thread Rebeca García Fandiño
.@vt.edu > To: gmx-users@gromacs.org > Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Re: boundaries in PMF > > > > On 5/31/12 3:37 PM, Rebeca García Fandiño wrote: > > Hi, > > the center of mass of my channel is at the middle of the ion channel, and > > it is > > a symmetric sy

RE: [gmx-users] Re: boundaries in PMF

2012-05-31 Thread Rebeca García Fandiño
Thu, 31 May 2012 15:52:48 -0400 > From: jalem...@vt.edu > To: gmx-users@gromacs.org > Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Re: boundaries in PMF > > > > On 5/31/12 3:51 PM, Rebeca García Fandiño wrote: > > OK, > > however, just one point about your last comment: > > > &

Re: [gmx-users] Re: boundaries in PMF

2012-05-31 Thread Justin A. Lemkul
On 5/31/12 3:51 PM, Rebeca García Fandiño wrote: OK, however, just one point about your last comment: > I suspect this is why g_wham is finding a range of values only equal to half of > your expected reaction coordinate; it is considering only the positive > displacement along the reaction

Re: [gmx-users] Re: boundaries in PMF

2012-05-31 Thread Justin A. Lemkul
On 5/31/12 3:37 PM, Rebeca García Fandiño wrote: Hi, the center of mass of my channel is at the middle of the ion channel, and it is a symmetric system, so I suppose these results would be OK. Anyway, I will check the options you propose. If you are sampling regions above and below the channe

RE: [gmx-users] Re: boundaries in PMF

2012-05-31 Thread Rebeca García Fandiño
Hi, the center of mass of my channel is at the middle of the ion channel, and it is a symmetric system, so I suppose these results would be OK. Anyway, I will check the options you propose. Thanks a lot for all your comments!! Best wishes, Rebeca. > Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 20:08:26 +0200 > From: