er of magnitude.
Berk
Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 16:39:22 +0430
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: gmx-users@gromacs.org
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] [ angle_restraints_z ]
Dear Berk,
Thanks for the reply.
Yes. In fact I made the choice of multiplicity=1 based on the explanation in
eq. 4.68:
"A multiplic
Dear Berk,
Thanks for the reply.
Yes. In fact I made the choice of multiplicity=1 based on the explanation
in eq. 4.68:
"A multiplicity (n) of 2 is useful when you do not want to distinguish
between parallel and anti-parallel vectors."
Since my molecule is slightly polar and it may matter whet
Date: Sat, 17 May 2008 08:48:28 +0330
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: gmx-users@gromacs.org
Subject: [gmx-users] [ angle_restraints_z ]
Hi all,
There are atoms (a1 and a2) in my small molecule coordinate file that have the
same z component:
a1: atom#22 (x1,y1,60.231)
a2: atom#45 (x2,y2,60.23
3 matches
Mail list logo
