On 2/21/13 6:30 PM, Elisabeth wrote:
Thanks Justin. Can you please elaborate on why for a binary
(solute+solvent) the size should be larger than 2 Rc? I thought minimum
image convention works for all atoms (solute ans solvent) and this makes
sure forces are not double-counted. What if the solut
Thanks Justin. Can you please elaborate on why for a binary
(solute+solvent) the size should be larger than 2 Rc? I thought minimum
image convention works for all atoms (solute ans solvent) and this makes
sure forces are not double-counted. What if the solute is a polymer, I mean
how can one calcul
On 2/21/13 6:10 PM, Elisabeth wrote:
Hello everyone,
Does anyone know if the minimum image convention has something to do with
the box size effect (independence of simulation results from system size) ?
i.e. When the box size is larger than 2*r_c, does this ensure that the
results are independ
:) thanks a ton.
-karamyog.On 5/30/06, Mark Abraham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
karamyog singh wrote:> Is there any limit for the system size that i want to simulate in gromacs?No, you are limited by your hardware and your lifetime.Mark___
gmx-users mailin
karamyog singh wrote:
Is there any limit for the system size that i want to simulate in gromacs?
-
karamyog.
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.groma
karamyog singh wrote:
Is there any limit for the system size that i want to simulate in gromacs?
No, you are limited by your hardware and your lifetime.
Mark
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/
Is there any limit for the system size that i want to simulate in gromacs?
-
karamyog.
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www
7 matches
Mail list logo