Re: [gmx-users] rigid tetrahedral molecule

2011-04-30 Thread David van der Spoel
rigid model. Mark Sanku *From:* David van der Spoel *To:* Discussion list for GROMACS users *Sent:* Fri, April 29, 2011 11:46:01 AM *Subject:* Re: [gmx-users] rigid tetrahedral molecule On 2011-04-29 17.55, gyorgy.han...@fc.up.pt <mailto:gyorgy.han...@fc.up.pt> wrote: &g

Re: [gmx-users] rigid tetrahedral molecule

2011-04-29 Thread Mark Abraham
r can be implemented, however. Mark Sanku *From:* David van der Spoel *To:* Discussion list for GROMACS users *Sent:* Fri, April 29, 2011 11:46:01 AM *Subject:* Re: [gmx-users] rigid tetrahedral molecule On 2011-04-29 17.55, gy

Re: [gmx-users] rigid tetrahedral molecule

2011-04-29 Thread Mark Abraham
r can be implemented, however. Mark Sanku *From:* David van der Spoel *To:* Discussion list for GROMACS users *Sent:* Fri, April 29, 2011 11:46:01 AM *Subject:* Re: [gmx-users] rigid tetrahedral molecule On 2011-04-29 17.55, gy

Re: [gmx-users] rigid tetrahedral molecule

2011-04-29 Thread David van der Spoel
ule 'rigid' might be good enough. But, gromacs does not explicitly do rigid body MD. That's why I was looking for a trick . From: Justin A. Lemkul To: Discussion list for GROMACS users Sent: Wed, April 27, 2011 8:25:05 PM Subject: Re: [gmx-users

Re: [gmx-users] rigid tetrahedral molecule

2011-04-29 Thread Sanku M
details of how to use virtual sites for a tetrahedral molecule. It would have been helpful. Sanku From: David van der Spoel To: Discussion list for GROMACS users Sent: Fri, April 29, 2011 11:46:01 AM Subject: Re: [gmx-users] rigid tetrahedral molecule On

Re: [gmx-users] rigid tetrahedral molecule

2011-04-29 Thread gyorgy . hantal
__ From: Justin A. Lemkul To: Discussion list for GROMACS users Sent: Wed, April 27, 2011 8:25:05 PM Subject: Re: [gmx-users] rigid tetrahedral molecule Sanku M wrote: Hi, I am interested in simulating a anionic molecule BF4(-) ( Boron tetrafluoride). In the paper whi

Re: [gmx-users] rigid tetrahedral molecule

2011-04-29 Thread David van der Spoel
___ From: Justin A. Lemkul To: Discussion list for GROMACS users Sent: Wed, April 27, 2011 8:25:05 PM Subject: Re: [gmx-users] rigid tetrahedral molecule Sanku M wrote: Hi, I am interested in simulating a anionic molecule BF4(-) ( Boron tetrafluoride). In the paper which developed the param

Re: [gmx-users] rigid tetrahedral molecule

2011-04-29 Thread gyorgy . hantal
. From: Justin A. Lemkul To: Discussion list for GROMACS users Sent: Wed, April 27, 2011 8:25:05 PM Subject: Re: [gmx-users] rigid tetrahedral molecule Sanku M wrote: Hi, I am interested in simulating a anionic molecule BF4(-) ( Boron tetrafluoride). In the

Re: [gmx-users] rigid tetrahedral molecule

2011-04-28 Thread Justin A. Lemkul
BF4F4 1 -0.4569 *From:* Mark Abraham *To:* Discussion list for GROMACS users *Sent:* Thu, April 28, 2011 1:00:42 AM *Subject:* Re: [gmx-users] rigid tetrahedral molecule On 4/28/2011 3:49 PM, Sanku M

Re: [gmx-users] rigid tetrahedral molecule

2011-04-28 Thread Mark Abraham
pled bond constraints) because it is fiddly to get such things right (and fast). Mark *From:* Mark Abraham *To:* Discussion list for GROMACS users *Sent:* Wed, April 27, 2011 11:14:34 PM *Subject:* Re: [gmx-users] rigid

Re: [gmx-users] rigid tetrahedral molecule

2011-04-28 Thread Sanku M
: Mark Abraham To: Discussion list for GROMACS users Sent: Thu, April 28, 2011 1:00:42 AM Subject: Re: [gmx-users] rigid tetrahedral molecule On 4/28/2011 3:49 PM, Sanku M wrote: I went through the LINCS manual . But, I am still struggling with coming up with the idea of putting correct

Re: [gmx-users] rigid tetrahedral molecule

2011-04-27 Thread Mark Abraham
to get such things right (and fast). Mark *From:* Mark Abraham *To:* Discussion list for GROMACS users *Sent:* Wed, April 27, 2011 11:14:34 PM *Subject:* Re: [gmx-users] rigid tetrahedral molecule On 4/28/2011 1:54 PM

Re: [gmx-users] rigid tetrahedral molecule

2011-04-27 Thread Sanku M
GROMACS users Sent: Wed, April 27, 2011 11:14:34 PM Subject: Re: [gmx-users] rigid tetrahedral molecule On 4/28/2011 1:54 PM, Sanku M wrote: Hi, > I tried to keep the geometry of the BF4 fixed by using constraints >using lincs. But , unfortunately, my simulation is cr

Re: [gmx-users] rigid tetrahedral molecule

2011-04-27 Thread Mark Abraham
1 34 5 3 1 24 5 4 1 23 5 5 1 23 4 *From:* Mark Abraham *To:* Discussion list for GROMACS users *Sent:* Wed, April 27, 2011 8:39:23 PM *Subject:* Re: [

Re: [gmx-users] rigid tetrahedral molecule

2011-04-27 Thread Sanku M
23 5 5 1 23 4 From: Mark Abraham To: Discussion list for GROMACS users Sent: Wed, April 27, 2011 8:39:23 PM Subject: Re: [gmx-users] rigid tetrahedral molecule On 4/28/2011 11:25 AM, Justin A. Lemkul wrote: > > > Sanku M wro

Re: [gmx-users] rigid tetrahedral molecule

2011-04-27 Thread Sanku M
25:05 PM Subject: Re: [gmx-users] rigid tetrahedral molecule Sanku M wrote: > Hi, > I am interested in simulating a anionic molecule BF4(-) ( Boron >tetrafluoride). In the paper which developed the parameters for this >molecule, >it is mentioned that it has been used as '

Re: [gmx-users] rigid tetrahedral molecule

2011-04-27 Thread Mark Abraham
On 4/28/2011 11:25 AM, Justin A. Lemkul wrote: Sanku M wrote: Hi, I am interested in simulating a anionic molecule BF4(-) ( Boron tetrafluoride). In the paper which developed the parameters for this molecule, it is mentioned that it has been used as 'rigid' molecule i.e the molecule only

Re: [gmx-users] rigid tetrahedral molecule

2011-04-27 Thread Justin A. Lemkul
Sanku M wrote: Hi, I am interested in simulating a anionic molecule BF4(-) ( Boron tetrafluoride). In the paper which developed the parameters for this molecule, it is mentioned that it has been used as 'rigid' molecule i.e the molecule only has non-bonding interaction but there was no i

[gmx-users] rigid tetrahedral molecule

2011-04-27 Thread Sanku M
Hi, I am interested in simulating a anionic molecule BF4(-) ( Boron tetrafluoride). In the paper which developed the parameters for this molecule, it is mentioned that it has been used as 'rigid' molecule i.e the molecule only has non-bonding interaction but there was no intramolecular motion