Re: Re: [Fwd: [gmx-users] preferred/best force fields]

2009-08-18 Thread iulek
Subject: [gmx-users] preferred/best force fields Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 12:35:18 -0300 From: iu...@interponta.com.br Reply-To: Discussion list for GROMACS users To: gmx-users@gromacs.org Dear All, I am new to molecular dynamics, had some tutorials and could run some

Re: [Fwd: [gmx-users] preferred/best force fields]

2009-08-17 Thread Mark Abraham
what I did below. Thanks, J. Original Message Subject: [gmx-users] preferred/best force fields Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 12:35:18 -0300 From: iu...@interponta.com.br Reply-To: Discussion list for GROMACS users To: gmx-users@gromacs.org Dear All, I am

[Fwd: [gmx-users] preferred/best force fields]

2009-08-17 Thread iulek
, J. Original Message Subject:[gmx-users] preferred/best force fields Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 12:35:18 -0300 From: iu...@interponta.com.br Reply-To: Discussion list for GROMACS users To: gmx-users@gromacs.org Dear All, I am new to molecular dynamics

[gmx-users] preferred/best force fields

2009-08-14 Thread iulek
Dear All, I am new to molecular dynamics, had some tutorials and could run some initial tests successfully in that they finished without errors (now to analyze if results make sense). Now my challenge is to make a molecular dynamics of a homohexamer which binds to a ssDNS and a co-f