Thanks for the link. Have just filed it.
Thanks and Regards,
Raghu
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 1:12 PM, Justin A. Lemkul wrote:
> Matthew Zwier wrote:
>
>> Nice catch on the readdir_r(). I wonder if the developers would
>> appreciate a bug report and patch for your fix.
>>
>>
> Yes, please file an
Matthew Zwier wrote:
Nice catch on the readdir_r(). I wonder if the developers would
appreciate a bug report and patch for your fix.
Yes, please file an issue report on redmine.gromacs.org. If it doesn't get put
on a to-do list, it probably won't get done :)
-Justin
On Fri, Apr 22, 20
Nice catch on the readdir_r(). I wonder if the developers would
appreciate a bug report and patch for your fix.
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 1:05 PM, Ragothaman Yennamalli
wrote:
> Hi all,
> With the help of my colleague Nathan Weeks I am able to run pdb2gmx and all
> other commands successfully . He
Hi all,
With the help of my colleague Nathan Weeks I am able to run pdb2gmx and all
other commands successfully . Here are his responses which he wanted me to
share with you in case someone is trying to install Gromacs in a similar
system.
We set CFLAGS that way due to the following message when r
to detect.
> Any hints will be appreciated.
>
>
> Please provide the exact commands that you used to install
>Gromacs.
>What exactly were the issues that you had to circumvent?
> Have you
> installed previous versions of
Matthew Zwier wrote:
Thanks. I'm no Sun expert, so I'd have to echo Justin's request for
the precise sequence of commands you used to install GROMACS and all
dependencies.
In addition, you can add -g to your CFLAGS to get debugging symbols, then
execute pdb2gmx via a debugger like gdb. Th
Thanks. I'm no Sun expert, so I'd have to echo Justin's request for
the precise sequence of commands you used to install GROMACS and all
dependencies.
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Ragothaman Yennamalli
wrote:
> It is a SunOS operating system, 64 bit with Eight 6-core AMD opteron CPUs.
>
> On
It is a SunOS operating system, 64 bit with Eight 6-core AMD opteron CPUs.
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Matthew Zwier wrote:
> I've never seen the -D_POSIX_PTHREAD_SEMANTICS before. What caused
> you to need to define that flag?
>
> Also...what hardware (cpu) and operating system (linux? w
I've never seen the -D_POSIX_PTHREAD_SEMANTICS before. What caused
you to need to define that flag?
Also...what hardware (cpu) and operating system (linux? what distro?
what version?) are you using?
Matt Z.
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/list
> pdb2gmx, which
>> I am not able to detect.
>> Any hints will be appreciated.
>>
>>
>> Please provide the exact commands that you used to install
>>Gromacs.
>>What exactly were the
versions of Gromacs that have worked, such
that
this problem is specific to 4.5.4?
-Justin
Thanks and Regards,
Raghu
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] pdb2gmx segmentation fault
To: Discussion list for GROMACS user
runs perfectly fine. So, there is some issue with pdb2gmx, which
>>I am not able to detect.
>>Any hints will be appreciated.
>>
>>
>>Please provide the exact commands that you used to install Gromacs.
>> What exactly were the issues that you had to c
ave you
installed previous versions of Gromacs that have worked, such that
this problem is specific to 4.5.4?
-Justin
Thanks and Regards,
Raghu
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] pdb2gmx segmentation fault
To: Discussion list for GROMACS users mailto:gmx-users@gro
mands that you used to install Gromacs. What
> exactly were the issues that you had to circumvent? Have you installed
> previous versions of Gromacs that have worked, such that this problem is
> specific to 4.5.4?
>
> -Justin
>
> Thanks and Regards,
>> Raghu
>>
>
?
-Justin
Thanks and Regards,
Raghu
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] pdb2gmx segmentation fault
To: Discussion list for GROMACS users <mailto:gmx-users@gromacs.org>>
Message-ID: <4dae452b.3090...@anu.edu.au
<mailto:4dae452b.3090...@anu.edu.au>>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
appreciated.
Thanks and Regards,
Raghu
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] pdb2gmx segmentation fault
To: Discussion list for GROMACS users
Message-ID: <4dae452b.3090...@anu.edu.au>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
On 4/20/2011 7:38 AM, Ragothaman Yennamalli wrote:
> Hi,
On 4/20/2011 7:38 AM, Ragothaman Yennamalli wrote:
Hi,
I have installed the latest version of gromacs 4.5.4 and the
installation went fine. When I run pdb2gmx I get Segmentation fault
even before I could select the force field options. I tried with
different pdb files and I get seg fault witho
Hi,
I have installed the latest version of gromacs 4.5.4 and the installation
went fine. When I run pdb2gmx I get Segmentation fault even before I could
select the force field options. I tried with different pdb files and I get
seg fault without any other error messages.
The command is: pdb2gmx -f
31:35
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] pdb2gmx: segmentation fault
Hi Joyce,
Can you post the command line? Does it also happen with other force fields? Is
there something notable about the pdb file?
Cheers,
Tsjerk
On Jan 13, 2011 7:48 AM, "Kwee Hong" wrote:
>
>
>Hi Mark,
>
>I
s actually saved as pdb file from autodock output using pymol.
Joyce
--
*From:* Mark Abraham
*To:* Discussion list for GROMACS users
*Sent:* Thursday, January 13, 2011 13:43:47
*Subject:* Re: [gmx-users] pdb2gmx: segmentation fault
On 01/13/11, Kwee Hong wrote: > >
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] pdb2gmx: segmentation fault
On 01/13/11, Kwee Hong wrote:
Hi,
>
>
> I was trying to generate topology file of my pdb using pdb2gmx.
>
>
>Select the Force Field:
> 0: GROMOS96 43a1 force field
> 1: GROMOS96 43a2 force field (improved alkane dihed
On 01/13/11, Kwee Hong wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
> I was trying to generate topology file of my pdb using pdb2gmx.
>
>
> Select the Force Field:
> 0: GROMOS96 43a1 force
> field
> 1: GROMOS96 43a2 force field (improved alkane dihedrals)
> 2: GROMOS96 45a3 force field (Schuler JC
Hi,
I was trying to generate topology file of my pdb using pdb2gmx.
Select the Force Field:
0: GROMOS96 43a1 force field
1: GROMOS96 43a2 force field (improved alkane dihedrals)
2: GROMOS96 45a3 force field (Schuler JCC 2001 22 1205)
3: GROMOS96 53a5 force field (JCC 2004 vol 25 pag 1656)
23 matches
Mail list logo