David van der Spoel wrote:
> On 2010-08-16 14.44, Maiki wrote:
>> David van der Spoel wrote:
>>> On 2010-08-16 12.34, Maiki wrote:
So, anybody knows why it does that or how to deal with nucleic acids?
I only saw one similar question asked recently (with different error)
which was als
On 2010-08-16 14.44, Maiki wrote:
David van der Spoel wrote:
On 2010-08-16 12.34, Maiki wrote:
So, anybody knows why it does that or how to deal with nucleic acids?
I only saw one similar question asked recently (with different error)
which was also left without answer.
Not all force fields ha
David van der Spoel wrote:
> On 2010-08-16 12.34, Maiki wrote:
>> So, anybody knows why it does that or how to deal with nucleic acids?
>> I only saw one similar question asked recently (with different error)
>> which was also left without answer.
> Not all force fields have complete support for DN
On 2010-08-16 12.34, Maiki wrote:
So, anybody knows why it does that or how to deal with nucleic acids?
I only saw one similar question asked recently (with different error)
which was also left without answer.
Not all force fields have complete support for DNA. Try Charmm.
Maiki wrote:
Hi,
I
So, anybody knows why it does that or how to deal with nucleic acids?
I only saw one similar question asked recently (with different error)
which was also left without answer.
Maiki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to convert protein-DNA complex using pdb2gmx with gromos53a6.ff
>
> $ pdb2gmx -f del.pdb
Hi,
I'm trying to convert protein-DNA complex using pdb2gmx with gromos53a6.ff
$ pdb2gmx -f del.pdb -o del.gro -p del.top -i del.itp -n del.ndx -ignh
In gromacs version 4.5-beta2 the result is:
Processing chain 3 'C' (516 atoms, 25 residues)
There are 0 donors and 0 acceptors
There are 0 hydrog
6 matches
Mail list logo
