Hi,
problem solved and it was a stupid mistake by me. The reference
structure I used (the -s option in trjconv) had the ligand out of the
active site. When I selected another reference with proper positioning
of the system, everything went well. Thanks anyway!
Sampo
Check out these cool wo
Sampo Karkola wrote:
Hi Mark,
visualisation of the .trr file with vmd succeeded, but the original
problem remains.The -pbc cluster option did not do any better. The weird
thing is that after trjconv with -pbc cluster, -center tric and -ur
compact (or without the latter two) produces a traject
An addition:
I have another trajectory with the same enzyme but another ligand with
exactly the same parameters and boxtype and simulated with the same
version of Gromacs and with the same machine at the same time. With this
one everything seems to work fine with g_angle and I also get correct
Hi Mark,
visualisation of the .trr file with vmd succeeded, but the original
problem remains.The -pbc cluster option did not do any better. The weird
thing is that after trjconv with -pbc cluster, -center tric and -ur
compact (or without the latter two) produces a trajectory with the
ligand i
Sampo Karkola wrote:
Dear list,
I have a simulation trajectory of a CYP enzyme with a ligand in a
truncated octahedron box with water and ions. The simulation went nice
with stabilising backbone rmsd and potential and total energies. Now I'm
interested in an angle formed by two atoms in a lig
Dear list,
I have a simulation trajectory of a CYP enzyme with a ligand in a
truncated octahedron box with water and ions. The simulation went nice
with stabilising backbone rmsd and potential and total energies. Now I'm
interested in an angle formed by two atoms in a ligand and the heme
iron
6 matches
Mail list logo