Re: [gmx-users] mdp option for implicit solvent simulation

2013-01-11 Thread Justin Lemkul
AM Subject: Re: [gmx-users] mdp option for implicit solvent simulation Hi, If you're simulating in the gas-phase, how come you want implicit solvent? Erik On Jan 11, 2013, at 5:07 AM, Sanku M wrote: Hi, I am trying to do implicit solvent simulation for a protein in gas-phase. I h

Re: [gmx-users] mdp option for implicit solvent simulation

2013-01-11 Thread Sanku M
Hi Erik,   That statement was a typo. The simulation will be done in implicit solvent ( not in gas phase). Sanku From: Erik Marklund To: Sanku M ; Discussion list for GROMACS users Sent: Friday, January 11, 2013 5:04 AM Subject: Re: [gmx-users] mdp option

Re: [gmx-users] mdp option for implicit solvent simulation

2013-01-11 Thread Erik Marklund
Hi, If you're simulating in the gas-phase, how come you want implicit solvent? Erik On Jan 11, 2013, at 5:07 AM, Sanku M wrote: Hi, I am trying to do implicit solvent simulation for a protein in gas- phase. I have a few questions : 1) should I use sd integrator? 2) should I also use n

[gmx-users] mdp option for implicit solvent simulation

2013-01-10 Thread Sanku M
Hi,   I am trying to do implicit solvent simulation for a protein in gas-phase. I have a few questions : 1) should I use sd integrator? 2) should I also use no periodic condition considering continuum dielectric ? 3) in the JCTC 2010 paper by Lindahl and co-worker, it is mentioned that no cutof