Re: [gmx-users] genconf and bonded interactions

2011-07-27 Thread Fabio Affinito
Ok, the problem is solved. Thank you. Fabio On 07/27/2011 05:17 PM, Justin A. Lemkul wrote: Fabio Affinito wrote: Thanks. This actually solved the problem in grompp. I still have problems when running. This is the log of mdrun: Initializing Domain Decomposition on 4096 nodes Dynamic load bal

Re: [gmx-users] genconf and bonded interactions

2011-07-27 Thread Justin A. Lemkul
Fabio Affinito wrote: Thanks. This actually solved the problem in grompp. I still have problems when running. This is the log of mdrun: Initializing Domain Decomposition on 4096 nodes Dynamic load balancing: auto Will sort the charge groups at every domain (re)decomposition Initial maximum int

Re: [gmx-users] genconf and bonded interactions

2011-07-27 Thread Fabio Affinito
Thanks. This actually solved the problem in grompp. I still have problems when running. This is the log of mdrun: Initializing Domain Decomposition on 4096 nodes Dynamic load balancing: auto Will sort the charge groups at every domain (re)decomposition Initial maximum inter charge-group distances

Re: [gmx-users] genconf and bonded interactions

2011-07-27 Thread Justin A. Lemkul
Fabio Affinito wrote: This is the key part: processing coordinates... Warning: atom name 18113 in topol.top and out.gro does not match (MN1 - CN1) Warning: atom name 18114 in topol.top and out.gro does not match (MN2 - CN2) Warning: atom name 18115 in topol.top and out.gro does not match (N

Re: [gmx-users] genconf and bonded interactions

2011-07-27 Thread Fabio Affinito
On 07/27/2011 04:12 PM, Justin A. Lemkul wrote: Fabio Affinito wrote: On 07/27/2011 03:54 PM, Justin A. Lemkul wrote: Fabio Affinito wrote: This is the mdrun output: Initializing Domain Decomposition on 4096 nodes Dynamic load balancing: auto Will sort the charge groups at every domain (r

Re: [gmx-users] genconf and bonded interactions

2011-07-27 Thread Justin A. Lemkul
Fabio Affinito wrote: On 07/27/2011 03:54 PM, Justin A. Lemkul wrote: Fabio Affinito wrote: This is the mdrun output: Initializing Domain Decomposition on 4096 nodes Dynamic load balancing: auto Will sort the charge groups at every domain (re)decomposition Initial maximum inter charge-grou

Re: [gmx-users] genconf and bonded interactions

2011-07-27 Thread Fabio Affinito
On 07/27/2011 03:54 PM, Justin A. Lemkul wrote: Fabio Affinito wrote: This is the mdrun output: Initializing Domain Decomposition on 4096 nodes Dynamic load balancing: auto Will sort the charge groups at every domain (re)decomposition Initial maximum inter charge-group distances: two-body bon

Re: [gmx-users] genconf and bonded interactions

2011-07-27 Thread Justin A. Lemkul
Fabio Affinito wrote: This is the mdrun output: Initializing Domain Decomposition on 4096 nodes Dynamic load balancing: auto Will sort the charge groups at every domain (re)decomposition Initial maximum inter charge-group distances: two-body bonded interactions: 30.031 nm, LJ-14, atoms 407

Re: [gmx-users] genconf and bonded interactions

2011-07-27 Thread Fabio Affinito
On 07/27/2011 03:38 PM, Justin A. Lemkul wrote: Please make sure to keep the discussion on the list. Sorry, I just was continuing the discussion after sending you my coordinates. Fabio Affinito wrote: Justin, first of all, I thank you very much for your help: it's very precious. I regret

Re: [gmx-users] genconf and bonded interactions

2011-07-27 Thread Justin A. Lemkul
Please make sure to keep the discussion on the list. Fabio Affinito wrote: Justin, first of all, I thank you very much for your help: it's very precious. I regret I didn't notice before the molecule was broken. I suggested to you yesterday that your initial configuration was broken. You to

Re: [gmx-users] genconf and bonded interactions

2011-07-27 Thread Justin A. Lemkul
The problem is indeed as I suspected. Your molecules are broken across periodic boundaries in the initial configuration. When you replicate with genbox, you've now replicated broken molecules such that those at the new interfaces between the boxes appear to be intact, but in fact they are no

Re: [gmx-users] genconf and bonded interactions

2011-07-27 Thread Justin A. Lemkul
Fabio Affinito wrote: On 07/26/2011 07:02 PM, Justin A. Lemkul wrote: Fabio Affinito wrote: On 07/26/2011 05:06 PM, Justin A. Lemkul wrote: Fabio Affinito wrote: Maybe this is a different issue... but it's ok that after the 99,999th atom the counter restarts from zero? 21374SOL OW

Re: [gmx-users] genconf and bonded interactions

2011-07-27 Thread Fabio Affinito
On 07/26/2011 07:02 PM, Justin A. Lemkul wrote: Fabio Affinito wrote: On 07/26/2011 05:06 PM, Justin A. Lemkul wrote: Fabio Affinito wrote: Maybe this is a different issue... but it's ok that after the 99,999th atom the counter restarts from zero? 21374SOL OW9 12.986 9.021 7.036 -0.0

Re: [gmx-users] genconf and bonded interactions

2011-07-26 Thread Justin A. Lemkul
Fabio Affinito wrote: On 07/26/2011 05:06 PM, Justin A. Lemkul wrote: Fabio Affinito wrote: Maybe this is a different issue... but it's ok that after the 99,999th atom the counter restarts from zero? 21374SOL OW9 12.986 9.021 7.036 -0.0037 -0.4345 0.3977 21374SOL HW1 0 13.069 8.987 7.

Re: [gmx-users] genconf and bonded interactions

2011-07-26 Thread Fabio Affinito
On 07/26/2011 05:06 PM, Justin A. Lemkul wrote: Fabio Affinito wrote: Maybe this is a different issue... but it's ok that after the 99,999th atom the counter restarts from zero? 21374SOL OW9 12.986 9.021 7.036 -0.0037 -0.4345 0.3977 21374SOL HW1 0 13.069 8.987 7.081 0.5916 0.5409 0.0638

Re: [gmx-users] genconf and bonded interactions

2011-07-26 Thread Justin A. Lemkul
Fabio Affinito wrote: Maybe this is a different issue... but it's ok that after the 99,999th atom the counter restarts from zero? 21374SOL OW9 12.986 9.021 7.036 -0.0037 -0.4345 0.3977 21374SOLHW10 13.069 8.987 7.081 0.5916 0.5409 0.0638 Could this be the or

Re: [gmx-users] genconf and bonded interactions

2011-07-26 Thread Fabio Affinito
Maybe this is a different issue... but it's ok that after the 99,999th atom the counter restarts from zero? 21374SOL OW9 12.986 9.021 7.036 -0.0037 -0.4345 0.3977 21374SOLHW10 13.069 8.987 7.081 0.5916 0.5409 0.0638 Could this be the origin of my problem? Than

Re: [gmx-users] genconf and bonded interactions

2011-07-26 Thread Justin A. Lemkul
Fabio Affinito wrote: On 07/26/2011 04:30 PM, Justin A. Lemkul wrote: Fabio Affinito wrote: On 07/26/2011 04:19 PM, Justin A. Lemkul wrote: Were the molecules whole in the coordinate file you replicated? If not, the bonds will now be assigned across the entire box. -Justin Yes and not

Re: [gmx-users] genconf and bonded interactions

2011-07-26 Thread Fabio Affinito
On 07/26/2011 04:30 PM, Justin A. Lemkul wrote: Fabio Affinito wrote: On 07/26/2011 04:19 PM, Justin A. Lemkul wrote: Were the molecules whole in the coordinate file you replicated? If not, the bonds will now be assigned across the entire box. -Justin Yes and not, depending on what you m

Re: [gmx-users] genconf and bonded interactions

2011-07-26 Thread Justin A. Lemkul
Fabio Affinito wrote: On 07/26/2011 04:19 PM, Justin A. Lemkul wrote: Were the molecules whole in the coordinate file you replicated? If not, the bonds will now be assigned across the entire box. -Justin Yes and not, depending on what you mean by "whole". It is an ion channel, so it's mad

Re: [gmx-users] genconf and bonded interactions

2011-07-26 Thread Fabio Affinito
On 07/26/2011 04:19 PM, Justin A. Lemkul wrote: Were the molecules whole in the coordinate file you replicated? If not, the bonds will now be assigned across the entire box. -Justin Yes and not, depending on what you mean by "whole". It is an ion channel, so it's made of four chains. This cl

Re: [gmx-users] genconf and bonded interactions

2011-07-26 Thread Justin A. Lemkul
Fabio Affinito wrote: Hi all, I used genconf because I wanted to replicate a membrane with ion channel on the xy plane: genconf -f conf.gro -o out.gro -nbox 2 2 1 Then I edited by hand the .top file where I modified the number of molecules in the system. When attempting to run, disregardi

[gmx-users] genconf and bonded interactions

2011-07-26 Thread Fabio Affinito
Hi all, I used genconf because I wanted to replicate a membrane with ion channel on the xy plane: genconf -f conf.gro -o out.gro -nbox 2 2 1 Then I edited by hand the .top file where I modified the number of molecules in the system. When attempting to run, disregarding the number of processo