Re: [gmx-users] gas-phase protein simulation

2011-11-30 Thread Justin A. Lemkul
Shi, Huilin wrote: Hi, Thank you for your reply. My concern is that if rcoulomb and rvdw are set to be zero, does it mean that there are no coulombic and van der waals forces involved in the simulation? I guess there are still coulombic and van der waals forces between atoms of a single

RE: [gmx-users] gas-phase protein simulation

2011-11-30 Thread Shi, Huilin
, 2011 3:00 PM To: Discussion list for GROMACS users Subject: Re: [gmx-users] gas-phase protein simulation yes all cutoffs 0 and epsilon_rf 1 and nstlist 0 as well. Toodle pip! On Nov 30, 2011, at 8:39 PM, "Shi, Huilin" mailto:huil...@imail.iu.edu>> wrote: Hi, I would like to

Re: [gmx-users] gas-phase protein simulation

2011-11-30 Thread Justin A. Lemkul
Shi, Huilin wrote: Hi, I would like to run a gas-phase protein simulation (with charge state of +8). I have read this paper : Biochemistry, 2007, 47, 933-945. In the method section of vaccum simulation, it is said "For the remaining parameters, the same settings were used as in the water

Re: [gmx-users] gas-phase protein simulation

2011-11-30 Thread David van der Spoel
yes all cutoffs 0 and epsilon_rf 1 and nstlist 0 as well. Toodle pip! On Nov 30, 2011, at 8:39 PM, "Shi, Huilin" wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to run a gas-phase protein simulation (with charge state of > +8). > I have read this paper : Biochemistry, 2007, 47, 933-945. > > In the method se

[gmx-users] gas-phase protein simulation

2011-11-30 Thread Shi, Huilin
Hi, I would like to run a gas-phase protein simulation (with charge state of +8). I have read this paper : Biochemistry, 2007, 47, 933-945. In the method section of vaccum simulation, it is said "For the remaining parameters, the same settings were used as in the water simulations, except that