Hi Peter,
Thanks for the reply. I'm not using the contact information at all
(-on is unspecified), and yes, it still generates a result for >6A in
the distance output (-od) , but the result for which atoms are at the
reported distance is sometimes missing from the atom pair output (-o)
file.
MZ
I have not read the source, but the default search radius for mindist is
6A. If you have no contacts within 6A of the atoms in the primary group
to the target group for a given frame, will it still generate a result,
since for all intents and purposes the array search should be null in
that case?
Hi all,
I'm running g_mindist (from 4.5.5) on a slew of very short
trajectories (51 frames) in order to obtain both minimum distances and
the corresponding atom pairs, using
echo 10 11 | g_mindist -nice 10 -f seg.xtc -n $NDX -s $TPR -nopbc -o
mindist_pairs.out -xvg none
where NDX and TPR are (va
On 9/11/2011 9:09 PM, Steven Neumann wrote:
Dear gmx Users,
I am wondering what is the value of Number of Contacts (<0.6 nm)
between two groups. When I specify one group - Ligand and second
- protein residue - does it count every dostance within 0.6 nm between
every atom from one group and eve
Dear gmx Users,
I am wondering what is the value of Number of Contacts (<0.6 nm) between
two groups. When I specify one group - Ligand and second - protein residue
- does it count every dostance within 0.6 nm between every atom from one
group and every atom from the second specified group?
Cheers
Dear users,
following Tsjerk' suggestions, I simulate the protein which had some
problems in periodic distance violations in a triclinic box, using instead a
rhombic dodecahedron box created with the options:
editconf -f prot.gro -o prot_boxdod.gro -bt dodecahedron -d 1.5 -c
Minimization, PR-NV
6 matches
Mail list logo