Thank you Sir.
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 4:33 PM, Erik Marklund wrote:
>
> On Mar 5, 2013, at 10:34 AM, Kavyashree M wrote:
>
> Sir,
>>
>> I used gromacs 4.6. I got the point - index file will tell how many
>> contacts an
>> atom has made during the trajectory. Whether it has made a contact with a
On Mar 5, 2013, at 10:34 AM, Kavyashree M wrote:
Sir,
I used gromacs 4.6. I got the point - index file will tell how many
contacts an
atom has made during the trajectory. Whether it has made a contact
with an
atom only in once or all the time, in the whole trajectory, it will be
mentioned.
Sir,
I used gromacs 4.6. I got the point - index file will tell how many
contacts an
atom has made during the trajectory. Whether it has made a contact with an
atom only in once or all the time, in the whole trajectory, it will be
mentioned.
Am I right?
So from the problem I had, can I say that n
To clarify: the -hbn output is not very indicative of how many
contacts there were since some of them could be present in one frame
but absent in 99. The -num option, however, provides the number of
contacts over time, and its time average probably tells you much more
in this case.
Wh
I am sorry There is no "7ws" Its a typographic error. What I wanted to ask
was -
I am comparing two simulations S1 and S2 for contacts at a given cut off
I used g_mdmat and g_hbond to calculate it.
g_hbond outputs: of "-num" and "-hbn" was considered.
1. -hbn output was analysed to calc
On 3/4/13 1:10 PM, Kavyashree M wrote:
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 11:10 PM, Justin Lemkul wrote:
When measuring contacts, you don't measure one group, you measure the
number of contacts that occur between groups A and B, which considers all
atoms in those two groups.
I gave a group of hydrop
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 11:10 PM, Justin Lemkul wrote:
>
> When measuring contacts, you don't measure one group, you measure the
> number of contacts that occur between groups A and B, which considers all
> atoms in those two groups.
>
I gave a group of hydrophobic atoms in both cases
The command
On 3/4/13 12:04 PM, Kavyashree M wrote:
Sir,
From Index file which gives the unique contacts -
First section the list of atoms I want to analyse
When measuring contacts, you don't measure one group, you measure the number of
contacts that occur between groups A and B, which considers all
Sir,
>From Index file which gives the unique contacts -
First section the list of atoms I want to analyse
[ C_CA_CB_CD_CD1_CD2_CE_CE1_CE2_CE3_CG_CG1_CG2_CZ_CZ2_CZ3_CH2 ]
second section : the unique contacts of each atoms with others
[ contacts_C_CA_CB_CD_CD1_CD2_CE_CE1_CE2_CE3_CG_CG1_CG2_CZ_CZ2_C
On 3/4/13 11:25 AM, Kavyashree M wrote:
Dear users,
I used the following tool for finding the contacts
g_hbond_46 -f a.xtc -s a.tpr -contact -n a.ndx -r 0.4 -hbm a.xpm -hbn a.ndx
-num a.xvg
From the index file, the number of contacts of each atom was extracted.
This and the
xvg output was co
Dear users,
I used the following tool for finding the contacts
g_hbond_46 -f a.xtc -s a.tpr -contact -n a.ndx -r 0.4 -hbm a.xpm -hbn a.ndx
-num a.xvg
>From the index file, the number of contacts of each atom was extracted.
This and the
xvg output was compared with another simulation.
It was found
11 matches
Mail list logo
