[gmx-users] g_analyze negative

2010-05-21 Thread Jacob Spooner
Hello gmx-users, I am attempting to use g_analyze to find the error estimate on the average volume of my system. Using an .xvg file with my volume data and the -ee flag I receive the following message. Found only 1 number on line, assuming no time is present. Read 1 sets of 611700 points, dt

RE: [gmx-users] g_analyze - negative parameters

2010-02-01 Thread Berk Hess
extremely long, or does your input have even longer times? Berk > From: maximilian.andr...@tu-dortmund.de > To: gmx-users@gromacs.org > Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2010 19:49:17 +0100 > Subject: [gmx-users] g_analyze - negative parameters > > Dear Gromacs-Users, > > I'

[gmx-users] g_analyze - negative parameters

2010-02-01 Thread Maximilian Andrews
Dear Gromacs-Users, I've been trying to figure out g_analyze for a while now (having read the manual references and papers), but I still haven't found out what a negative parameter obtained during fitting means. It's clear that when Tau2 is longer than the total simulation time the sampling is bad