RE: [gmx-users] definition of J-couplings in g_chi

2008-07-31 Thread Abil Aliev
a >>>> heteronuclear 3J(1H,15N) coupling between the Ha proton and the 15N >>>> nucleus which is 3 bonds away from Ha. >>>> >>>> Going back to the reason for my question, when running g_chi for a PRO >>>> containing peptide there s

Re: [gmx-users] definition of J-couplings in g_chi

2008-07-30 Thread David van der Spoel
ouble check the source code. Abil Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 15:18:16 +0200 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: gmx-users@gromacs.org Subject: Re: [gmx-users] definition of J-couplings in g_chi Abil Aliev wrote: yes, i already checked gmx_chi.c (see my previous

RE: [gmx-users] definition of J-couplings in g_chi

2008-07-29 Thread Abil Aliev
CTED] > To: gmx-users@gromacs.org > Subject: Re: [gmx-users] definition of J-couplings in g_chi > > Abil Aliev wrote: >> yes, i already checked gmx_chi.c (see my previous message pasted below), and >> J_NHa is for proton-proton coupling between N-H and Ca-H protons. The >>

Re: [gmx-users] definition of J-couplings in g_chi

2008-07-16 Thread David van der Spoel
insists that there is J_NHa coupling for PRO ?! Abil Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 08:55:26 +0200 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: gmx-users@gromacs.org Subject: Re: [gmx-users] definition of J-couplings in g_chi Abil Aliev wrote: Justin, thanks for your response. I am merely trying to understand whether

RE: [gmx-users] definition of J-couplings in g_chi

2008-07-16 Thread Abil Aliev
or PRO in the J_NHa column in chi.log as there is no proton attached to N of PRO. But g_chi insists that there is J_NHa coupling for PRO ?! Abil > Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 08:55:26 +0200 > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: gmx-users@gromacs.org &g

Re: [gmx-users] definition of J-couplings in g_chi

2008-07-14 Thread David van der Spoel
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: gmx-users@gromacs.org Subject: Re: [gmx-users] definition of J-couplings in g_chi The manual will not spell everything out for you, but a little bit of background reading will give you the answer. From g_chi -h: "... (b) The NMR 3J coupling constants from the Ka

RE: [gmx-users] definition of J-couplings in g_chi

2008-07-14 Thread Abil Aliev
or PRO in the J_NHa column in chi.log as there is no proton attached to N of PRO. But g_chi insists that there is J_NHa coupling for PRO ?! Abil > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: gmx-users@gromacs.org > Subject: RE: [gmx-users] definition of J

RE: [gmx-users] definition of J-couplings in g_chi

2008-07-14 Thread Abil Aliev
omacs.org > Subject: Re: [gmx-users] definition of J-couplings in g_chi > > The manual will not spell everything out for you, but a little bit of > background > reading will give you the answer. From g_chi -h: > > "... > (b) The NMR 3J coupling constants from the Kar

Re: [gmx-users] definition of J-couplings in g_chi

2008-07-14 Thread Justin A. Lemkul
The manual will not spell everything out for you, but a little bit of background reading will give you the answer. From g_chi -h: "... (b) The NMR 3J coupling constants from the Karplus equation. ..." The curious individual would then probably look up what the Karplus equation is, and via Goo

[gmx-users] definition of J-couplings in g_chi

2008-07-14 Thread Abil Aliev
Hello, I couldnt find definitions of vicinal J-couplings used in g_chi from the online manual. These are the J-couplings listed by g_chi: J_NHa J_HaC' J_NHCb J_Ci-1HaiJ_HaN JHaHb2 JHaHb3 Thank you, Abil _ Invite you